Guild Wars 2

Super Kruegs.8967:

Vaxx.3178:

Super Kruegs.8967:

Holy kitten I make one post about TC not having any good GUILD GROUPS UNDER 10 (all caps so your not distracted by other key words like zerg etc.) and 3 pages later TC is still defending their honor. Jeez you guys it’s like you’ve never been called out for all being in one zerg on a map before. It’s classic TC and anyone that’s fought TC knows it’s true. All I was trying to do is get some guild somewhere to give me a “fight me bro” so i could get my first even fight of the match up with my guildies. Let me be clear TC doesn’t ALWAYS zerg just most of the time, TC isn’t all miltia baddies just most of them, TC doesn’t always have more numbers just most the time(FA is stronger in OCX, possibly NA), FA has zerg guilds, FA will blob with multiple guild groups. All myself the furious one are trying to say is where all da TC roamers and small guilds at? and if they do in fact exist (I’m skeptical) who are they and how can we find them? If not why not break off say 5-10 from your zerg to havoc on map so they can get better instead of being #1 pushers all the time? or hey if you got 15 on wall and 5 of us outside why not jump down get out of cannon range and fight us instead of turtlling up all the time? Go get you some fights we’re waiting outside of your T3 keeps.

Why not kill the bigger groups then? If TC does nothing but zerg it up, you should have not a hard time taking them out with smaller numbers.

My guild has not had more than 17 online in the past week, and still fight blobs of SoS and FA 2x – 4x our numbers. We do this every night. I would like to say we win them all, but that does not always happen. The nice thing is, nobody in our TS cries about it, much less makes multiple forum post about it.

Instead of trying to “set something up” why not take your own advice and go “get some fights” bigger or smaller. Or….you can sit there and cry about how unfair this or that is….your choice.

Ummm. wtf you think we’ve been doing all week? For outside observers of this thread this is TC mentality. This guy has no more than 17 all week and he’s fighting an uphill battle. I asked where all the roamers and small guild groups (10 and under) are. We’ve been eating TC zerg tails all week hence the plea for some small group action. And hey I’d love more 7v17 unfortunately almost every time i get those odds it’s either under AC or cannon fire. So your 17 have been fighting 4x your numbers? Hear that everyone this guys guild takes on 60-70 at a time every friggin night!!!!! He doesn’t win them all but at least they don’t QQ. Ever take on 60-70 under cannon/AC fire with only your 17? What map are you on? I want to see these 60-70 man SOS/FA blobs your taking on every night. We are 5-8 most nights we fight unfair odds every day no matter what the match up is. Difference is SOR/MAG/SOS hell almost any other server isn’t afraid to get off the siege and come out and play. Even the T1 servers have good small group guilds OPP/RIOT just to name a few. I’m done with this thread, best of luck to all servers next week, GG to TC for the win this week, and may all your Gw2 dreams come true.

Mmmm dat FA qq, so good. Keep with the sauce baby it just makes it even better on my end.

Raf.1078:

I really have no interest in small group action. I play WvW, not Tpvp…I use siege, fight from battlements, use cannon on infantry, retreat to the safety of the keep if necessary and fight in the zerg. I carry supply and build siege in field to give our zerg an advantage over an enemy group…large or small.

We’ll use the full force of the zerg on “any” quantity of enemy players. Simply because you are in the way as we proceed to the next objective.

Our numbers are legion….the TC Militia really doesn’t give a fat rats kitten about small groups. Except to make them dead.

This person does not speak for everyone… to say the least.

Aberrant.6749:

Raf.1078:

I really have no interest in small group action. I play WvW, not Tpvp…I use siege, fight from battlements, use cannon on infantry, retreat to the safety of the keep if necessary and fight in the zerg. I carry supply and build siege in field to give our zerg an advantage over an enemy group…large or small.

We’ll use the full force of the zerg on “any” quantity of enemy players. Simply because you are in the way as we proceed to the next objective.

Our numbers are legion….the TC Militia really doesn’t give a fat rats kitten about small groups. Except to make them dead.

This person does not speak for everyone… to say the least.

Actually I thought it was very well said. As someone who likes open-field fights, people like Raf are the people who will allow us to do zergbusting all night long. It beats stacking swiftness because FA is trying to ninja a tower…again.

Give me 2-3 guys in every tower and keep with full AC and cannon mastery (and 3 pts. in treb). That’s how YB does it, and I wish we had more militia who were willing to do this.

Sadly, though kinda awesome at the same time, WvW on SoS is really popular with people who like to mix it up in open field fights. Plays heck on our PPT, but it makes things more fun.

Aberrant.6749:

Raf.1078:

I really have no interest in small group action. I play WvW, not Tpvp…I use siege, fight from battlements, use cannon on infantry, retreat to the safety of the keep if necessary and fight in the zerg. I carry supply and build siege in field to give our zerg an advantage over an enemy group…large or small.

We’ll use the full force of the zerg on “any” quantity of enemy players. Simply because you are in the way as we proceed to the next objective.

Our numbers are legion….the TC Militia really doesn’t give a fat rats kitten about small groups. Except to make them dead.

This person does not speak for everyone… to say the least.

There is no way any person on any forum can ever speak for the entire server. The statements above are my own. A tongue in cheek non apology for zerging. It seems like all too many TC’ers are trying so hard to convince others that we don’t zerg.

Its total bs….we zerg, they zerg…all servers zerg when it suits them. I have no problem with zerging. I have no problem with a zerg to taking down a smaller group. Happens all the time.

One on one…you small groupers are better than me. So I run with the zerg. Lots of us do. Numbers are “usually” better than skill.

kitten good week TC here is to hoping we at FA get that dice roll that puts us against you often…it’s always fun when you know the fight will be brought all week long /bow

Bucket Lips.5017:

Overall this was a good match-up. It is nice to face the T2’s again. The score is close as it should be for everyone on the 3 servers to enjoy a fairly equal and competitive match.

I hope Anet doesn’t do leagues again cause it sucks kitten . Either you stomp or get stomped, no fun at all.

I’m looking forward to facing SoR soon. If TC can beat them and TC only beat us by 15k, then it should be a pretty good test for us and it should be a close match. I think FA, TC & SoR would be incredibly close, that is if there’s no 2vs1, which I can’t see happening.

You don’t see the full picture here. You can’t compare this week vs gold league week 6. There are big differences.

1. JQ focused SoR most of the week. That allowed TC to pick up points where we could against either server.
2. That week there were queues on TC on basically all 4 maps during NA prime
3. This week, there hasn’t even been a queue in EB most nights.

I think in general a lot of players are suffering from a post league let down. I’d imagine FA and SoS have fewer players this week as well.

Personally, I enjoy fighting FA more than any other server. They are much more fun to fight than many T1 servers. In T1, you’ll see servers building AC for open field battles. In T2, you see people actually fight. Much more fun.

So much anger for what was not a bad match.

There seemed to be high expectations, nurtured from weeks of Silver League, that got dashed on FA; but they should’ve known better.

This match is going to be a regular thing for awhile, with SoR having only a 1 in 20 chance of rolling down; it’ll be TC-SoS-(probably FA) for a good long while.

YB might pop in once in a while which should be fun. I’m hoping for a crack at SBI before they quickly shuffle off to the dustbin.

GFs with GF. Those scrimmages were tons of fun, and we should do some more.

We’ll have to form a Holy Pickle fanclub too.

“Mansplaining” is a really dumb-sounding word.

Dhampyr.2104:

“Mansplaining” is a really dumb-sounding word.

Indeed.
/15charr

virtue.7235:

Agg vs HOPE
Some really good fights

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMZmH0RTANc

Hey yo, where is Jericho? Also, looked to me like things have changed somewhat with you guys or something is up cause it really looked like you guys were having a hard time taking HOPE done even when spiking them. That is not typical of the AGG I had become acutely accustomed to playing against.

Raf.1078:

Aberrant.6749:

Raf.1078:

I really have no interest in small group action. I play WvW, not Tpvp…I use siege, fight from battlements, use cannon on infantry, retreat to the safety of the keep if necessary and fight in the zerg. I carry supply and build siege in field to give our zerg an advantage over an enemy group…large or small.

We’ll use the full force of the zerg on “any” quantity of enemy players. Simply because you are in the way as we proceed to the next objective.

Our numbers are legion….the TC Militia really doesn’t give a fat rats kitten about small groups. Except to make them dead.

This person does not speak for everyone… to say the least.

There is no way any person on any forum can ever speak for the entire server. The statements above are my own. A tongue in cheek non apology for zerging. It seems like all too many TC’ers are trying so hard to convince others that we don’t zerg.

Its total bs….we zerg, they zerg…all servers zerg when it suits them. I have no problem with zerging. I have no problem with a zerg to taking down a smaller group. Happens all the time.

One on one…you small groupers are better than me. So I run with the zerg. Lots of us do. Numbers are “usually” better than skill.

Even though you are my enemy, I gotta agree with you. If people don’t wanna see zergs then move down to the lower tiers. I for one love all the action of a large scale fight. Or if they’re hell bent on 1vs1 then go PvP, there’s that option in GW2. WvW is mostly intended for large group fights and teamwork.

I like havok teams and I support more of this sort of playstyle as long as those in my server doing it help and communicate with each other or with the commander. else, the havok team does more damage than good. While I can’t force ppl to help each other, this is my take on it. I don’t claim tc looks at it this way nor my guildmates, just me.

:3

A combination and understanding of which method to play at any given time is what creates wins. That said, good fights FA and SoS. I really don’t mean this to sound passively aggressive but I don’t know of another way to say it so I’ll just say it; Don’t lose heart so easily. I think most core TC players can tell when your groups have just given up mentally. You can beat us. Keep trying and keep growing.

Sovereign.1093:

I like havok teams and I support more of this sort of playstyle as long as those in my server doing it help and communicate with each other or with the commander. else, the havok team does more damage than good. While I can’t force ppl to help each other, this is my take on it. I don’t claim tc looks at it this way nor my guildmates, just me.

:3

Havoc teams (good ones) do not need any instruction or guidance from anyone. Its those havoc teams that are fighting on an enemy borderland alone in outmanned situations at most times. Its those teams that are randomly flipping keeps, towers and camps when nobody else is around. SoS has some, TC has some and FA has some of these teams.

A lot of what these teams do are never realized, I’ve seen teams from all the servers decimating reinforcements trying to reach their keep that is under siege. Its these teams that patch gates behind enemy zergs and contest waypoints.

Those teams will gladly communicate and work with commanders & other havoc teams IF they are on map and IF the commander doesn’t make foolish maneuvers that waste the havoc groups time. Such as when a havoc team has a wall at 40% and the commander runs right past the group, drops siege on the gate and proceeds to uber blob the gate to death.
(We try and work with whatever commander or teams are on map, but we also can think for ourselves and don’t need to be asked to do everything. Doesn’t take much communication to look at mos and determine a camp needs to be flipped.)

The one thing I’ll say about every dedicated havoc group I’ve ever seen, from multiple different servers. You don’t try and boss them around, and you make friends with em, they will think nothing of slamming a golem into a T3 keep vs an 80 man blob to buy you time to take something else. Annoy them, and your going to find yourself without some of your best scouts, without camps, tapped waypoints or bloodlust.

Quells.2498:

A combination and understanding of which method to play at any given time is what creates wins. That said, good fights FA and SoS. I really don’t mean this to sound passively aggressive but I don’t know of another way to say it so I’ll just say it; Don’t lose heart so easily. I think most core TC players can tell when your groups have just given up mentally. You can beat us. Keep trying and keep growing.

You ever have that coworker or fellow student who gets on your nerves and you can’t stand seeing them everyday.

It gets to the point where the most exciting thing about a day off or a weekend is not seeing them for a few days? Even if you respect them, or think they can be charming at times; you just can’t stand the way they keep their desk in one massive blob of stuff.

Yeah, it’s getting like that.

Icewielder.4195:

Sovereign.1093:

I like havok teams and I support more of this sort of playstyle as long as those in my server doing it help and communicate with each other or with the commander. else, the havok team does more damage than good. While I can’t force ppl to help each other, this is my take on it. I don’t claim tc looks at it this way nor my guildmates, just me.

:3

Havoc teams (good ones) do not need any instruction or guidance from anyone. Its those havoc teams that are fighting on an enemy borderland alone in outmanned situations at most times. Its those teams that are randomly flipping keeps, towers and camps when nobody else is around. SoS has some, TC has some and FA has some of these teams.

A lot of what these teams do are never realized, I’ve seen teams from all the servers decimating reinforcements trying to reach their keep that is under siege. Its these teams that patch gates behind enemy zergs and contest waypoints.

Those teams will gladly communicate and work with commanders & other havoc teams IF they are on map and IF the commander doesn’t make foolish maneuvers that waste the havoc groups time. Such as when a havoc team has a wall at 40% and the commander runs right past the group, drops siege on the gate and proceeds to uber blob the gate to death.
(We try and work with whatever commander or teams are on map, but we also can think for ourselves and don’t need to be asked to do everything. Doesn’t take much communication to look at mos and determine a camp needs to be flipped.)

The one thing I’ll say about every dedicated havoc group I’ve ever seen, from multiple different servers. You don’t try and boss them around, and you make friends with em, they will think nothing of slamming a golem into a T3 keep vs an 80 man blob to buy you time to take something else. Annoy them, and your going to find yourself without some of your best scouts, without camps, tapped waypoints or bloodlust.

We’ve talked about this a long time ago and let’s agree to disagree.

Sovereign.1093:

We’ve talked about this a long time ago and let’s agree to disagree.

Nah your just wrong….its k we know!

Lurock Turoth.9085:

Sovereign.1093:

We’ve talked about this a long time ago and let’s agree to disagree.

Nah your just wrong….its k we know!

If you say so.

To FA and SOS I had fun this week. It’s reset, I do hope to play with you again if and when I’m online in wvw. o7

TC, let’s keep getting better.

Chris.3290:

Did FA tank? Yes
Was it intentional? Probably not.
Was Maguuma better than FA? Maguuma in tryhard mode is impressive. We may never see it again.

Blobs? All three servers blob. FA blobs the least having spent more time in the nosebleed seats than TC and SoS.

Conclusion: No one did NOT see this week’s results coming. TC still has numbers at all hours, where FA and SoS have gaps.
FA should get kudos for the very tough NA they brought to this match, as well as good OCX.
SoS is working to improve and trying to shore up some of our gaps to keep this competitive and hopefully get things to the point where the outcome is in doubt every week (which should be our goal if we want this to be at all interesting.)

I like this guy. +100 #agree

WyldKat.4712:

Well, at least this thread feels a lot of homey now.

We’re back together with FA. It’s the holidays. There are unnecessary but vigorous discussions about traditional and beaten to death topics.

Spike my egg nog and tie me up in a ribbon.

Best post <3 ily