Commander tag system
Maybe a rank system, the basic tag you buy fr 100gold starts off white then ranks as you WvW with it active to blue > green > yellow > orange > pink > purple. Then you can see which commanders are more experienced. Ofc.. then this would lead to people ignoring the less experienced ones so they wouldn’t have chance to lvl.. hmm.
The less experienced commanders are, naturally, lead by the more experienced. Used in splitting fashion, you can get more done, get more experience. The only problem with that is we don’t have a back history that goes far enough. . . or maybe we do, wait.
Take all of the WvW achievement tracks (you know those titles which you’ll be finishing, like, ten years from now) and add up the points on a slightly weighted scale (like, 1 point per Supply spent, 5 per dolyak kill, 15 points per keep capture), and come up with a new cumulative WvW achievement track which is used primarily for placing the commanders into these ranks, like Dinsy mentioned. It’s a good idea
(then once you left WvW it’d go back to your PvE rank status, like maybe total achievement points, etc.)
Maybe a rank system, the basic tag you buy fr 100gold starts off white then ranks as you WvW with it active to blue > green > yellow > orange > pink > purple. Then you can see which commanders are more experienced. Ofc.. then this would lead to people ignoring the less experienced ones so they wouldn’t have chance to lvl.. hmm.
This. The system Op proposed would make the highest ranked commanders go higher in rank, and the lower ranked commanders stay low in rank. It would not do one single thing to help the problem, because there are commanders with alot of WvW experience that still suck as commanders, and there are some newer ones who just got their tag that are actually pretty good.