Anet, if there's demand, why look away?
How about a thread where I suggest dynamics events and PvE content in sPvP? Why should I be locked out of PvP from lack of PvE content in there. Why can’t they put nodes in the map for me to harvest while remaining green to all others. Maybe they could add repeatable hearts on the PvP maps. It’s only fair, if PvP gets put into PvE.
If they did that, there would be a lot of PvE people going on to those maps.
PvP(WvW and SPvP) has PvE content in them. It has from the start.
How about a thread where I suggest dynamics events and PvE content in sPvP? Why should I be locked out of PvP from lack of PvE content in there. Why can’t they put nodes in the map for me to harvest while remaining green to all others. Maybe they could add repeatable hearts on the PvP maps. It’s only fair, if PvP gets put into PvE.
If they did that, there would be a lot of PvE people going on to those maps.
You know, the dynamic events in sPvP isnt a bad idea. I rather like it, actually. Even in WvW.
So how will your dueling effect dynamic events? I want dueling but there are problems beyond your “I want it so it’s kewl” arguments.
Oh of course, the dynamic events.
..What?
I don’t see how it would effect dynamic events. What relevance does it have on dynamic events?
There is the flaw in your thinking only about what you want. Scaling up dynamic events when you will not be participating in said event. That is what I was talking about. As I said I want open world dueling but there are plenty of reasons why it is not in this game.
According to the developers it’s because it’s not a priority right now. A developer over in the PvP forums previously said that they want to add open world dueling to the game, it’s just not the highest on their list of priorities. If I remember correctly, Colin said something like “we absolutely want to add dueling to the game in the future.” in an interview as well.
Wow, I had no idea. That’s fantastic news.
How about a thread where I suggest dynamics events and PvE content in sPvP? Why should I be locked out of PvP from lack of PvE content in there. Why can’t they put nodes in the map for me to harvest while remaining green to all others. Maybe they could add repeatable hearts on the PvP maps. It’s only fair, if PvP gets put into PvE.
If they did that, there would be a lot of PvE people going on to those maps.
PvP(WvW and SPvP) has PvE content in them. It has from the start.
It’s been an abomination too. How well did the living story garbage work in the first WvW tourney?
For lemon skittles to degrade someone’s game’s performance, they’d have to drop the skittles on their CPU or into a Ram slot. Chance of this occurring: pretty small. For mounts to degrade some peoples’ game’s performance, they would only have to be on screen. Chances of that occurring: virtually every play session.
I’m not saying I’m opposed to all of the items on your list, but having some of them is not going to be a win/no effect scenario, but a win/lose. Responsible devs take the issues of both sides into consideration.
The one I have strong feelings about is P2P trading. That’s a no from me — because it would affect me due to: greater inflation as more people choose to bypass the only major gold sink in the game; and WTS spam in chat. I should not have to disable chat channels so players can bypass the TP.
In regards to the performance loss of mounts, perhaps it’s time for the addition of a new API. Dx 11 would require quite an overhaul, but if something is so obviously beneficial to the game, why refrain from taking the next step?
- I’m not entirely thrilled by the choices ANet made for many of the background programming in the game. I’d love to see some of them addressed. That said, I’m pretty sure my list and yours have nothing in common. That’s the thing. ANet tries to please as many people as possible while moving the game in the direction they want it to go. In a addition to different groups of players with different visions of where they’d like the game to progress, ANet also has goals. It’s inevitable that some things you’d like are not in the cards, and that others are lower priorities than you’d like to see. I say that as someone whose personal preferences have been largely ignored.
- Nice dodge on the trading point.
How about a thread where I suggest dynamics events and PvE content in sPvP? Why should I be locked out of PvP from lack of PvE content in there. Why can’t they put nodes in the map for me to harvest while remaining green to all others. Maybe they could add repeatable hearts on the PvP maps. It’s only fair, if PvP gets put into PvE.
If they did that, there would be a lot of PvE people going on to those maps.
PvP(WvW and SPvP) has PvE content in them. It has from the start.
It’s been an abomination too. How well did the living story garbage work in the first WvW tourney?
Trial and error. The basis of success.
How about a thread where I suggest dynamics events and PvE content in sPvP? Why should I be locked out of PvP from lack of PvE content in there. Why can’t they put nodes in the map for me to harvest while remaining green to all others. Maybe they could add repeatable hearts on the PvP maps. It’s only fair, if PvP gets put into PvE.
If they did that, there would be a lot of PvE people going on to those maps.
PvP(WvW and SPvP) has PvE content in them. It has from the start.
WvW yes, but I’m suggesting it for sPvP. Why cant they put nodes in sPvP for me to farm. I’ll just pop in and farm. How can it hurt? Those matches are unbalanced in numbers already so it won’t make any difference.
ANet may give it to you.
- I’m not entirely thrilled by the choices ANet made for many of the background programming in the game. I’d love to see some of them addressed. That said, I’m pretty sure my list and yours have nothing in common. That’s the thing. ANet tries to please as many people as possible while moving the game in the direction they want it to go. In a addition to different groups of players with different visions of where they’d like the game to progress, ANet also has goals. It’s inevitable that some things you’d like are not in the cards, and that others are lower priorities than you’d like to see. I say that as someone whose personal preferences have been largely ignored.
- Nice dodge on the trading point.
I wrote a comment about how I retract any argument I’ve made for the trading system being a good idea, sorry if you felt like I was avoiding the topic.