I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: frans.8092

frans.8092

In GW1 you could use Texmod to change textures and colors, some people used sets to highlight the animations of specific skills.
While it’s use was condoned with GW1, I do not know it’s status with GW2.

I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Goettel.4389

Goettel.4389

Nothing more manly than not caring.

Send an Asura who knows math. Problem solved.

I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Dvantaman.3617

Dvantaman.3617

Hello Folks , can I ask something ?
I want to buy gems using my credit card .. but can I have an idea
how much it cost ?

like $4.00 = for 100 gems .. like that

http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Gems
http://wiki.guildwars2.com/wiki/Gem_Store

Hope this helps.

Thanks ! By the way , I still haven’t played GW 2 .. I’m from the Philippines..
so if I will buy Gems using my credit card .. what currency will I use ?
is it still dollars ? (Sorry for my bad english) -_-

I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: VOLKON.1290

VOLKON.1290

Real men (and mesmer women, of course) use pink to melt your brains from the inside. What could be manlier than that?

#TeamJadeQuarry

I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Zaith.9132

Zaith.9132

Only real men have the guts to wear pink. Also, a lot of gals dig guys in purple and pink.

/me tips transmuted tier-3 crafted hat

I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Kojiden.8405

Kojiden.8405

I’d like it if I could make a sylvarri that sounded at least somewhat aggressive.

I will pay $100.00+ USD worth of gems.

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: FacesOfMu.3561

FacesOfMu.3561

Pink is the colour that used to be associated with baby boys (light red). Purple is the colour associated with royalty and the divine. Pink and purple is one of the most manly colour combinations you can get.

Pink is a vastly misunderstood colour. It’s just a social construct when people apply interpersonal meaning to it. Whatever you think it means or represents is mostly a conclusion made by you and some peers here and now, but isn’t universally or historically true:

In the United States, there was no established rule in the 19th century. A 1927 survey of ten department stores reported that pink was preferred for boys in six of them and for girls in four. The foremost student of the role of color in children’s fashion, Jo Paoletti, found that “By the 1950s, pink was strongly associated with femininity” but to an extent that was “neither rigid nor universal” as it later became.

Some date the origin of the association of pink with girls in the United States to the 1910s or 1920s. Many have noted the contrary association of pink with boys in 20th-century America. An article in the trade publication Earnshaw’s Infants’ Department in June 1918 said:
“The generally accepted rule is pink for the boys, and blue for the girls. The reason is that pink, being a more decided and stronger color, is more suitable for the boy, while blue, which is more delicate and dainty, is prettier for the girl.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink#In_gender

People vary.