My female asura looks like a girl.
I’m glad you’re using one of the three armorsets outfits that actually display the female version.
Still, I want to be a man if I can’t be a girl.
Oh okay I’m sorry.
My Asura looks like a girl.
If anything, I’d call that another problem with armors in general: SKIRTS!
Because that armor really isn’t supposed to be feminine…except it’s a skirt-type light armor. Are you saying males wearing that same armorset are girlish?
But this I find is a problem with GW2 armors in general…and with a lot of MMOs now-a-days, they put in so many butt-capes and skirts, it leaves little option for variety…it’s like people think those skirt dealies look good when your avatar is running around, jumping and kicking stuff…it’s not.
To be honest warriors in the time used to wear long hauberks that goes down to their knees or lower thighs which might look like a skirt with a belt. Not to mention roman centurions. Skirts and kilts for heavy armor never struck me as odd or feminine, personally, even on dudes. I’m actually surprised that other MMOs don’t use that style of armor much.
But yeah, I think it’s more the sheer number of them that’s problematic. Like I said in a previous post, in the case of skirts/kilts, I think it would have been better if they at least had more bare legged ones to break the monotony. There’s only Pitfighter. More armors like Pitfighter would be nice for heavy.
That also goes with what I said about missing variety. We talk about skirts for heavies but medium are stuck with lots and lots of trenchcoats so it isn’t much better their way. I know this is mostly to avoid potential clipping between the legs and the chest when mix-matching, but it hurts variety.
