(edited by Charrlizard.8041)
Laptop
Cheapest option to get the best performance for that price is to build from parts.
What dell do you have now, so we have an idea what you have (curious to know what “shouldn’t” have been able to play GW2) so we have an idea what to exceed.
RIP City of Heroes
if you was about to replace the hard-drive anyway, why don’t you just replace it ? it will be a lot cheaper than buying a new machine, thats providing it is the hard drive of course.
you can always use this hard-drive when you do purchase a new machine as well, so its not like it will just go to waste.
I’m running an Asus K55N (with the AMD A8-4500 APU). This box only ran me a bit over $400. However, my graphics settings tend toward the medium side of the equation, with low WvW specs. I range about 35-40 fps on a good run, down to ~20 in a zerg/lagged down.
Whatever you snag, just make sure to have either a Radeon or Nvidia GPU. Intel HD
sets are pretty meh, tbh. The only problem is that anything Intel and/or Nvidia equipped is going to run you more than an AMD lappy. Anywhere from $100-200 higher, in general.
Other 80s: Any but Warrior
If you’re going to game with a laptop, be sure to find one that has a DEDICATED video card. A lot of the “on-board” GPUs aren’t well suited for it.
I just recently got an ACER Aspire V3-5716-9868 with an i7 and nVidia GT640 from newegg.com, and it runs GW2 beautifully. That one might be a little outside your budget, but there were other similar models that might be within your price range. The only downside that I found was it comes with Windows h8. After some abusing it, it can be made to function at a tolerable level.
Join Us – http://www.thegryphonsaerie.com
I don’t have any specifics, but after playing/seeing GW2 on several different machines, CPU is much more important than graphics. My mom’s old Q6600 (2.4GHz quad core) with an ATI4000 series card (weaker end, forgot the exact #) runs GW2 better than my current desktop with an overclocked 1055t (3.5GHz six core) and a nvidia 560TI.
That’s not saying you shouldn’t have a dedicated graphics card, but don’t skimp on the CPU or you’ll struggle playing the game on the higher settings.
Edited to add: Since it may be unclear, stick with Intel processors even if they have a slower clock speed than a similar AMD one at the same price. I’m pretty certain that the Intel one will provide much better performance.
and style to turn them into craters and dust.” -Tonn
Number-crunching for ecto salvages – periodically updated
(edited by ExTribble.7108)
I don’t have any specifics, but after playing/seeing GW2 on several different machines, CPU is much more important than graphics. My mom’s old Q6600 (2.4GHz quad core) with an ATI4000 series card (weaker end, forgot the exact #) runs GW2 better than my current desktop with an overclocked 1055t (3.5GHz six core) and a nvidia 560TI.
That’s not saying you shouldn’t have a dedicated graphics card, but don’t skimp on the CPU or you’ll struggle playing the game on the higher settings.
Quite true. I also suggested a dedicated GPU for one major reason. Our OP may want a box to play GW2, but who knows if that’s the only game (s)he ever plays. Past that, you’re definitely right about this specific game being more of a CPU-trasher than GPU.
From my last box to this one, I’ve noticed some fps gain. And I gained more in CPU than in GPU, respectively.
Other 80s: Any but Warrior