Opinions on the new features
It seems players can get high on the ladder without actually being good at PvP but rather play a lot of ranked games and get these points as much as they can without much consideration to win/lose ratio.
not entirely true.
if players are matched against really good teams, they will not be able to reach the minimum team points threshold of 200 points at all. it will result in blowouts like 500 vs 100+ at best.
only players who play a lot, and lose matches with a team score of at least 400 will have a chance to steadily climb the current test season leader board.
I think the problem is that even the best players can’t get high on the leaderboards without playing a LOT of ranked games.
Maybe they should create two leaderboards, one to track games won and one to track players skill level.
Even so, you can just “farm” the ranked games to get more points. Another issue that may rise by this leader board greed is that players which are mainly there for their place on the ladder might stay to cap points without any consideration of the situation (example 3 players on one empty capture point) only to achieve the 100 points needed to get a score. (not 100% sure about that)
I think the problem is that even the best players can’t get high on the leaderboards without playing a LOT of ranked games.
Maybe they should create two leaderboards, one to track games won and one to track players skill level.
There is no perfect way for a system to determine a players “skill” level for a leader board… You want a leader board to reward players with high win %? Then we go back to rewarding players that are 7-0 and never play again. Put a set amount of games in that must be played to prevent this? Now you are still making it a grind. They want to reward players who play the kitten game. If someone wants to have no life and play 600 games in 30 days, so be it; he gets a reward. At least he is dedicated. You want to reward only the BEST players? Ok, so Noscoc is a top player..he only plays 20 games in 30 days but gets a reward for being one of the best. That makes no sense. If the top players really want a reward (they don’t give a kitten), then they will need to play the games like everyone else. Anet never said we will rewards the best 250 players in the game…They said they will reward the top 250 players on the LB’s (aka, the most dedicated to playing, aka the hardcore PvPers, whether they are the best or not).
Everyone is complaining about how they have to actually PvP to get a reward. Sad. The rewards are stupid anyway. But my god, what was Anet thinking on making you actually have to PvP to get a reward. Were you the guy that was 11-3 in the top 10 of LB’s? Now your mad because you can’t exploit for a free reward? Play & you shall receive. If a mini Llama that important to you, I don’t know what to say.
Even so, you can just “farm” the ranked games to get more points. Another issue that may rise by this leader board greed is that players which are mainly there for their place on the ladder might stay to cap points without any consideration of the situation (example 3 players on one empty capture point) only to achieve the 100 points needed to get a score. (not 100% sure about that)
This is exactly how it doesn’t work.
#1 Player Comoros
(edited by GhOst.4019)