(edited by Arkham Creed.7358)
Post level 80 character progression
Addendum:
Recently (no I don’t have a link) Arena Net made it known that they were looking into some way to allow players to swap out individual skills on their weapons. An often requested feature. And it occurs to me that this utility trait idea is the perfect way to do that. You see back before release Arena Net had in place a system of trait lines for each weapon type in the game, and players could earn new traits through alternative means (now skill challenges) that would allow them to alter the form and function of their weapon skills.
Bring that back with this idea. Starting at level eighty players can begin progressing through “weapon mastery” trait lines either through repeated kills with each weapon type, or renewed profession challenges. As these lines are progressed players would gain the ability to slot in traits that could drastically alter the effect of existing weapon skills, or even completely replace certain skills with all new ones. Their old system, the new thing players demand, and presented as alternative character progression. This is a win/win without doubt.
Total lack of responses….okay….
Strange, I honestly thought this was a good idea. Oh well, one last bump and that’s it.
I love this idea. I think things like trait lines like this could be expanded to account for all sorts of things including [possibly] waypoint costs, repair costs, or retrait costs, with the maximum discount being 15-30%. Gold sinks exist for a reason, but doing something like this would be quite cool.
In my opinion, it should follow the WvW system of leveling, requiring a different amount of skill points at each tier, and being essentially nonrefundable.
For example:
Waypoint Costs:
Tier 1: 2% Discount: 5 Skill Points.
Tier 2: 4% Discount: 10 Skill Points.
Tier 3: 6% Discount: 15 Skill Points.
Tier 4: 8% Discount: 20 Skill Points.
…
Tier 15: 30% Discount: 75 Skill Points.
Just make it get silly high so that a person can’t max out everything in every trait line, thus breaking the effectiveness of a money sink.
This is just a single example, but I definitely think that it should follow a quadratic regression as opposed to a linear regression model.