I don't understand the EU links

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: arnitheking.8427

arnitheking.8427

I don’t understand why fsp and piken square got a link and seafarer’s rest and deso didn’t?
Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link). I know I don’t have access to wvw data or anything, maybe sfr/deso showed higher activity in the last weeks? but it seems like the links make very little sense.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: arnitheking.8427

arnitheking.8427

Also I may add that KDR wise the last t1 MUs have been the most balanced we have possibly ever had on t1 (all kds close to 1), fights were nice and even..ppt was imbalanced but I know few ppl in eu t1 that give a “kitten” about ppt.

Why put a link to fsp, they are already (probably) the strongest fight-server on eu? now so many good players will just transfer to fsp for easy fights, we already lost entire guilds on RS, and probably a lot of players that understand you can just spend 100 gold to stomp everything in wvw

I have to admit, will all due respect, that this decision feels like the devs may not be as well connected to EU wvw as they are to NA wvw

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Leaa.2943

Leaa.2943

I have to agree with this. Piken is overstacked tot he teath and they got a link. FSP managed on their own and yet they got links, whilst Deso was so empty last week and the few we met we rotfl-stomped most of the week. Sfr have been super empty since long, so how come Piken the overstacked server have a link and sfr dont? It looks like something went wrong with the links.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Digikid.7230

Digikid.7230

EU has been even more unbalanced then NA for a while now, what happened to the guilds spreading out for even matchups thing EU had going on for couple of years?

Some guy on a bunch of servers, mostly Mag
Former top 50 spvp engi main.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Algerius.5238

Algerius.5238

Can someone from Anet please comment on WHY are the linkings like this?

Why 2 T1 servers one full and the other very high have linkings, and servers like sfr don’kittens

the worse linking they pulled out, just merge already you clearly have no idea what you’re doing, a 5yo kid would do it better.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: bigFM.8642

bigFM.8642

It does not make the slightest bit of sense, i have completely lost faith in what Anet is doing with server links. Piken just rolls over any matchup for 6 weeks and yet they get linked, so all the bandwagon can stay there for easy wins. FSP is strongest fight server and gets a link, already people are moving there in masses to get carried. Desolation and SFR who are not anywhere nearly as strong as those two get NO links. No one can tell me that there is any plan here, that this does anthing but destroy most servers and WvW overall as a game mode. I alwys thought the theory about them wanting to make money through transfers was crazy, but now i can’t find any other rtational explanation. That or they want to get rid of WvW altogether, which will happen inevitably if all but two servers are basically dead and communities get destroyed on a monthly basis. Honestly, why not turn the servers off now and save us the slow death?

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Dawdler.8521

Dawdler.8521

Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link).

lolwat?!

Piken has dominated T1 for 4 weeks with zero competition from both FSP and Riverside, solely due to massive numbers.

Hopefully the links will shuffle it up a bit, otherwise we are back to the same kittening stalemate of one server to dominate them all.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: CrimsonNeonite.1048

CrimsonNeonite.1048

Because they think AG will be saved with 2 links.
Piken isn’t really that stacked though, queues aren’t that bad, especially compared to Vabbilation when the linking tests started.

Scrubio
Plays completely opposite professions to his main Teef.

(edited by CrimsonNeonite.1048)

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Jayne.9251

Jayne.9251

EU has been even more unbalanced then NA for a while now, what happened to the guilds spreading out for even matchups thing EU had going on for couple of years?

Linking kind of borked EU. I’m hoping they revert EU back to solo servers. It may bring folks back.

L’enfer, c’est les autres

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Deniara Devious.3948

Deniara Devious.3948

Because they think AG will be saved with 2 links.
Piken isn’t really that stacked though, queues aren’t that bad, especially compared to Vabbilation when the linking tests started.

This is NO excuse, because I am pretty sure overall numbers have went down.

In fact I very well remember a time in 2012-2014, when there was a prime time queue to ALL 4 maps without ANY server links and the maps limits were higher back then.

Deso had a “full” server status, while having NO queue to ANY map at prime time and NO queues outside prime either or occasionally having a very short 1-10 player queue to 1 map. That just tells that the Arenanet formulas related to server population status are indeed a bad joke.

The sad reality is:
1. Arenanet developers NEVER understood WvWvW at all
2. WvWvW still lacks rewards (where is the ascended item vendor, legendary/ascended backbag, gold per h similar to pve farm?)
3. skill & profession balance when it comes to WvWvW has been a really bad joke

Just fix #2, then the numbers are already going to be much better. And then fix #3.

Deniara / Ayna – I want the original WvWvW maps back – Desolation [EU]

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: len.7809

len.7809

This week’s match up is pretty good for SFR since its Very high population server. SFR vs 3 linked server vs 3 linked server. I dont see the problem, now tell me. How high are the chances SFR will win this match up?

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: CrimsonNeonite.1048

CrimsonNeonite.1048

Because they think AG will be saved with 2 links.
Piken isn’t really that stacked though, queues aren’t that bad, especially compared to Vabbilation when the linking tests started.

This is NO excuse, because I am pretty sure overall numbers have went down.

There are probably less players on the Main server, they’re either Full or Very High populated these days, when they’re not.

Scrubio
Plays completely opposite professions to his main Teef.

(edited by CrimsonNeonite.1048)

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Thea Cherry.6327

Thea Cherry.6327

Nobody understands the linkins, cause they don’t make any sense.

ANet what are you doing? What is wrong with you? Can we help you? O.o

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: apharma.3741

apharma.3741

I still don’t know why some servers are linked, I guess there’s a handful of servers that have to be linked that would be way too strong without a counterbalance which in turn leaves pools of not very high population servers being meshed together like AG. They then have to give them something to fight like an unlinked SFR that they can manage.

I think they need to split up the national servers a little so they don’t end up with a map blob on each map because they have to link 3 of them together.

At least I might be able to go deer hunting this linking…

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: ilmau.9781

ilmau.9781

Nobody understands the linkins, cause they don’t make any sense.

ANet what are you doing? What is wrong with you? Can we help you? O.o

+1

[Hell] Kresh Bloodghast
Seafarer’s Rest Alliance Leader – www.pevepe.net/gw2

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Liston.9708

Liston.9708


I have to admit, will all due respect, that this decision feels like the devs may not be as well connected to EU wvw as they are to NA wvw

well in NA the #9 server got no link and #3 and #4 both got 2 links… They don’t understand NA either……

YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→YB→most likely YB

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Korgov.7645

Korgov.7645

It is not possible to create equal teams with the world linking. Stop expecting it would.

It currently is not possible for us to establish an “equal” number of players on each link/world with the current world sizes.

source

Sulkshine – Mesmer
This won’t hurt [Much]
Ring of Fire

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Altair.2975

Altair.2975

Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link).

lolwat?!

Piken has dominated T1 for 4 weeks with zero competition from both FSP and Riverside, solely due to massive numbers.

Hopefully the links will shuffle it up a bit, otherwise we are back to the same kittening stalemate of one server to dominate them all.

lol you are clueless, if you are actively playing either of those three server you would ‘ve known that piken have numbers without any other server but it’s clearly not over-stacked that so-called dominated is due to fsp sleeping and bored from ppt not from lack of numbers while riverside on the other hand they don’t sleep and they are hard tryers they caping kitten like crazy

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Altair.2975

Altair.2975

I don’t understand why fsp and piken square got a link and seafarer’s rest and deso didn’t?
Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link). I know I don’t have access to wvw data or anything, maybe sfr/deso showed higher activity in the last weeks? but it seems like the links make very little sense.

Let me tell you something deso was top before all the time because of the linked server,it went down when it lost it and people who choose to stay and transferred to deso are those numbers you are seeing them but Fsp on the other hand attracted people and get good transfers to it without any linked sever and Fsp is definitely with most numbers on it’s own.
So noone is stoping people to transfer to Deso but people not willing to throw 1800 gems

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Sianon.3586

Sianon.3586

In all honesty the linking is never going to work when people can transfer every time the wind changes direction. How are they meant to know the wvw population when it changes every 5 minutes by people moving server?

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: ilmau.9781

ilmau.9781

In all honesty the linking is never going to work when people can transfer every time the wind changes direction. How are they meant to know the wvw population when it changes every 5 minutes by people moving server?

that is exactly THE PLAN.

anyway, i am still waiting an answer from Anet, what is the logic behind the current links? I really do want understand.

[Hell] Kresh Bloodghast
Seafarer’s Rest Alliance Leader – www.pevepe.net/gw2

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: RodOfDeath.5247

RodOfDeath.5247

In all honesty the linking is never going to work when people can transfer every time the wind changes direction. How are they meant to know the wvw population when it changes every 5 minutes by people moving server?

And anet likes that, more transferring equals a potential source of profit from wvw.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Eagle.7208

Eagle.7208

Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link).

lolwat?!

Piken has dominated T1 for 4 weeks with zero competition from both FSP and Riverside, solely due to massive numbers.

Hopefully the links will shuffle it up a bit, otherwise we are back to the same kittening stalemate of one server to dominate them all.

Hola,

Archi from Far Shiverpeaks here. In all honesty I whilest we (Fsp) do have the potential, only a handfull off us actually work on points per tic. If you were to look at for example the kill death ratio’s I think that offers a far better view on our server.

Either way, before you praise Piken who has been linked for over 3 months to us where we had to keep our head up single handed. Take a look at this week, we finally received reinforcements from Vabbi and let me put it this way. Piken is nowhere to be found at this point now their old link is gone. We’re partying in their keeps continuesly.

Long story short; We (the top 3 servers Piken/River/Fsp) are just carrying the links, and I think the linking is because Anet realises WvW is close to dieing, therefore they link low servers to high servers in the hope that the players from the low pop servers will transfer. That for one keeps WvW more alive for all of us, and Anet earns moneyzz.

Let me know what you guys think.

- Archi

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Junkpile.7439

Junkpile.7439

I think that they should think EotM when they link servers because it’s only active game mode.

Low quality trolling since launch
Seafarer’s Rest EotM grinch

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Offair.2563

Offair.2563

In all honesty the linking is never going to work when people can transfer every time the wind changes direction. How are they meant to know the wvw population when it changes every 5 minutes by people moving server?

And anet likes that, more transferring equals a potential source of profit from wvw.

KACHING …..Here with your transfer moneyzzzz!

Big Babou, Ranger for life.
Madness Rises [Rise] – Banners Hold.
Don’t argue with idiots, they pull you down their level and own you with experience.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Imhottep.8504

Imhottep.8504

Dear Anet, a sugestion.

Remove a tear, and give everyone at least a link (sorry BB)

Get rid of 3 of the following servers, as server hosts: Ring of Fire, Aurora Glade, Abaddoun’s Mouth or Dakkar Lake.

And reshuffle all links. With that, no more whine about gem price and everyone as a chance for fair fights.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Ragnarox.9601

Ragnarox.9601

Gandara got Whiteside Ridge but it feels we got nothing.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: MarkBecks.6453

MarkBecks.6453

I honestly cannot understand why a dedicated person cannot sit down with the communities, and figure a workaround to bring life into WvW before its destroyed completely. Unlinked server against 5 linked French servers last week, same unlinked server against 4 linked German servers this week, I call that diabolical, enough said.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Svarty.8019

Svarty.8019

I don’t understand why fsp and piken square got a link and seafarer’s rest and deso didn’t?
Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link). I know I don’t have access to wvw data or anything, maybe sfr/deso showed higher activity in the last weeks? but it seems like the links make very little sense.

Here is why:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/wuv/World-Linking-8-26-2016/page/4

Our goal with World Linking is good matches. This doesn’t necessarily mean that worlds in tier 4 are intended to be competitive with worlds in tier 1, but ideally every world in tier 4 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 4 and likewise every world in tier 1 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 1.

Nobody at Anet loves WvW like Grouch loved PvP. That’s what we need, a WvW Grouch, but taller.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: DevilishLyx.2340

DevilishLyx.2340

Transferring servers generate a big of moolah for anet. WvW players are the only ones who need to transfer servers now. PvE players have it easy. Loot literally scattered on the floor you trip over it! Gold flooding into your wallet! Whilst with WvW we need “balance” to make sure we dont get too much gold, whilst at the same time guild upgrades drain players of their gold and resources. Not forgetting enemy players with multiple accounts wasting away the tactivators which we spent so much of our gold and resources on, so we need to spend even more to take account of such acts of sabotage!
So there’s your answer, keep the WvW players unhappy that they feel that it’s the server that is the problem and force them to continue to skip from one server to another.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Dawdler.8521

Dawdler.8521

I don’t understand why fsp and piken square got a link and seafarer’s rest and deso didn’t?
Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link). I know I don’t have access to wvw data or anything, maybe sfr/deso showed higher activity in the last weeks? but it seems like the links make very little sense.

Here is why:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/wuv/World-Linking-8-26-2016/page/4

Our goal with World Linking is good matches. This doesn’t necessarily mean that worlds in tier 4 are intended to be competitive with worlds in tier 1, but ideally every world in tier 4 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 4 and likewise every world in tier 1 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 1.

Which basicly means you are stuck in your tier because Anet will artificially keep you and the 2 other servers there.

Its pretty much the complete opposite of the original intent of WvW tiers. Anet are treating us like babies that cant handle defeat.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: shiri.4257

shiri.4257

[/quote]

Its pretty much the complete opposite of the original intent of WvW tiers. Anet are treating us like babies that cant handle defeat.

[/quote]

This is true though. that’s why people transfer.

~Kasumei/Machiato
Desert Spectre [VII]-Crystal Desert
“You’re never out of the fight.”

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Rambitshouse.8712

Rambitshouse.8712

I honestly cannot understand why a dedicated person cannot sit down with the communities, and figure a workaround to bring life into WvW before its destroyed completely. Unlinked server against 5 linked French servers last week, same unlinked server against 4 linked German servers this week, I call that diabolical, enough said.

I don’t doubt a brave dev tried to step up to the plate and offer their time. But do you honestly think they want to waste any resources or time on wvw?

Some companies and management are perfectly fine with average results.

Dtox

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Svarty.8019

Svarty.8019

I don’t understand why fsp and piken square got a link and seafarer’s rest and deso didn’t?
Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link). I know I don’t have access to wvw data or anything, maybe sfr/deso showed higher activity in the last weeks? but it seems like the links make very little sense.

Here is why:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/wuv/World-Linking-8-26-2016/page/4

Our goal with World Linking is good matches. This doesn’t necessarily mean that worlds in tier 4 are intended to be competitive with worlds in tier 1, but ideally every world in tier 4 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 4 and likewise every world in tier 1 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 1.

Which basicly means you are stuck in your tier because Anet will artificially keep you and the 2 other servers there.

Its pretty much the complete opposite of the original intent of WvW tiers. Anet are treating us like babies that cant handle defeat.

If you mean, “It is now logical to bandwagon transfer to T1 rather than try to work your server up the ladder, because the tiers are fixed”, then you’re right!

Nobody at Anet loves WvW like Grouch loved PvP. That’s what we need, a WvW Grouch, but taller.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Chetumal.5784

Chetumal.5784

You all don’t get it. ANet is treating us (WvW players) like kitten since 2 years.
They don’t care about us or the WvW. They only care about money. They won’t change anything for good. So, stop whining, play that kitten or look for another game. I will go for another game. I am sick and tired.

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: ilmau.9781

ilmau.9781

I don’t understand why fsp and piken square got a link and seafarer’s rest and deso didn’t?
Both piken and fsp are strong enough as is and were t1 (piken admittedly with link, but fsp without link). I know I don’t have access to wvw data or anything, maybe sfr/deso showed higher activity in the last weeks? but it seems like the links make very little sense.

Here is why:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/wuv/World-Linking-8-26-2016/page/4

Our goal with World Linking is good matches. This doesn’t necessarily mean that worlds in tier 4 are intended to be competitive with worlds in tier 1, but ideally every world in tier 4 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 4 and likewise every world in tier 1 should be competitive with the other worlds in tier 1.

While i do understand the idea behind this choice i still have MANY doubs about. For example, i do not think that SFR alone vs Aurora Glade & Fissure of Woe & Ruins of Surmia vs Ring of Fire & Underworld & Gunnar’s Hold can be considered “balanced”, just check the score and let me know..

[Hell] Kresh Bloodghast
Seafarer’s Rest Alliance Leader – www.pevepe.net/gw2

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Jayne.9251

Jayne.9251

Every time I see you falling, I get down on my ….

L’enfer, c’est les autres

I don't understand the EU links

in WvW

Posted by: Moderator

Moderator

We’re going to go ahead and close this thread, as match-up threads are not permitted on the forums.