annonymous match up's ?

annonymous match up's ?

in WvW

Posted by: thefinnster.7105

thefinnster.7105

ok week 5 in to season 1 and i have had alot of fun but with the stakes being higher than ever before i am seeing alot of server aliances against others leading to realy unbalanced match ups
im prety sure wvw isnt suposed to be like this anyone whose ever player a game like planteside and fought in a persistant pvp enviroment knows you dont team up with your enemys against one perticular enemy for a prolonged period of time.
its a free for all 3 way fight more like what it should be you gang up on the leader and all fight for first
the problem is knowing who you are fighting you are able to see who the higher ranked team is and the underdogs just pick on the big dogs i dont really see that as how WvW is supposed to be
so my sujestion is make match ups annonymous withold match results till the end of the season so no one knows where each other stands or who they are even fighting the goal is we all aim for first and no one teams up except to drag the leader down and try and contest first
i do reaslie there are ways you could find out who you are fighting and it is not a full proof method but it would make it harder to find out who you are up against and potentialy make earning first more chalangeing in a more balanced way
it s just a sujestion but if anyone has a better idea plz share id like to hear what you all think
ps plz excuse my poor grammer brain no work well sleep without

annonymous match up's ?

in WvW

Posted by: Jocksy.3415

Jocksy.3415

When I command (not at prime times – usually at night EU, so not many people), I take in consideration the state of my troops (number, and how they follow), the number of people on the other server (how fast they cap structrures / camps gives indication on their numbers / strategy).
I do not care at all who is the other server; I try to make it so that people following me will have a great time.

So, depending on my assessment of the situation, if we are less / people don’t really follow, I will go on the map where there is no ennemies. If we are a decent amount of players, and I see server A is attacking sever B, I will go and attack server B also, because I know they are busy elsewhere.
It is part of the strategy that a 3v3 war allows. It is absolutely not an “agreement”, all commanders (I hope) take decisions based on who is there, and who isn’t – where they are, and how many they are, how they fight, and how we can fight.
Any kind of complaints about 2v1 are kind of pointless, in my view… WvWvW was made so that there can be 2v1s… break the 2v1 againts you, and let another one be created against one of your foes…

Not knowing the servers or overall points is by no way going to stop 2v1s…

annonymous match up's ?

in WvW

Posted by: thefinnster.7105

thefinnster.7105

yes these kind of things are going to happen but what im talking about is something compleatly different team A attacks team B and never attacks team C at all and team C attacks team B and never attacks team A in fact ive seen A and C clash acidently thinking each other are team B and then quickly realiseing and spliting apart from each other (without anyone killing each other) to attack diff points of team B’s turf

these are not situational opertinty attacks but conspierd colaberations and truces designed to bring down a perticular team

(edited by thefinnster.7105)