Guild Wars 2

silvermember.8941:

Actually “everything is subject to change” exist because players like you tend to complain how they broke their promises. So they put disclaimers so that they can invalidate any arguments such as yours.

I don’t think you understand what you read. Your first reply would seem to betray the same thing, as I talk about a new player and you talk about “they” being able to store up gold… for which they need to have had the game beforehand, therefore not being new. The disclaimer prevents me from taking legal action, no doubt, but you are fighting against an imaginary argument, because mine was that a smart consumer would be wary of a company who so easily misleads its consumers on their paid product’s direction. The cited text doesn’t change that at all. You should actually try reading what people type instead of typing arrogant and grandiose nonsense.

I enjoy being snarky especially when I m destroying person’s argument. Even more so when the resort to a fallacy.

I see. I didn’t even contradict or refute anything you said, I just added my own spin on being “smart”. I can just imagine the compulsion to frantically searh the article, desperately looking for anything that could possibly dismiss a criticism towards Anet from some dude who dared reply back. Can’t help but wonder the type of person that regularly defends a company from a consumer’s skeptical eye. Marketing shill? 16 year old fanboy? Who knows? What an amazing picture, the snark combined with the early claim “of destroying an argument” you haven’t addressed paint a picture of much insecurity indeed.

And just because I’m feeling generous, here’s a hint: you should read more about fallacies – wikipedia isn’t enough to know when and where they apply. If I wanted to conjure up a fallacy to attack your position, I’d do something like: “So what you’re telling me is that because of that disclaimer I can’t trust anything Anet says? Your telling me that nothing they say is true and they can’t be trusted?” What I did was follow your reasoning, which you didn’t even bother to explain, as if a citing the dev would defeat my point by magic alone. Apologism never ceases to amaze.

I think this meta is amazing for burst-ele specs! Fresh air can just burst through, cc, and blind condi specs into death, yet condi is still just strong enough to keep thieves at bay!

Even then, fights with most thieves are interesting b/c you have the ability to 1-shot them if/when they mess up. Luckily most play predictable so you just use your cc when they are gonna burst then counter-burst and win!

When the thieves are away, the eles shall play!

I will say i love the new d/f celestial build.

TainoFuerte.8136:

silvermember.8941:

Actually “everything is subject to change” exist because players like you tend to complain how they broke their promises. So they put disclaimers so that they can invalidate any arguments such as yours.

I don’t think you understand what you read. Your first reply would seem to betray the same thing, as I talk about a new player and you talk about “they” being able to store up gold… for which they need to have had the game beforehand, therefore not being new. The disclaimer prevents me from taking legal action, no doubt, but you are fighting against an imaginary argument, because mine was that a smart consumer would be wary of a company who so easily misleads its consumers on their paid product’s direction. The cited text doesn’t change that at all. You should actually try reading what people type instead of typing arrogant and grandiose nonsense.

I enjoy being snarky especially when I m destroying person’s argument. Even more so when the resort to a fallacy.

-toot

I am going to be honest here. I don’t read forum post longer than 5 sentences. So don’t bother you probably said some stuff and good for you.

I made my point and you probably made yours, so how about we just move on from that. Honestly, I wont convince you with my valid points and you wont convince me with whatever you try and come up with.