To you who bandwagonned DH;

To you who bandwagonned DH;

in Guardian

Posted by: Arken.3725

Arken.3725

I never understood the necessity to bandwagon DH, I’ve experienced stronger specs in Rev, Scrapper and to some degree, Reaper. I guess since I’ve played Guardian since beta that I might be a bit biased but I find the first two to be far superior.

To you who bandwagonned DH;

in Guardian

Posted by: Ghotistyx.6942

Ghotistyx.6942

well not everyone is english native, so u should have a little open mind and trying to understand trough grammar mistakes.

Trust me, I’m quite familiar with people not speaking English natively. However, there’s a difference between typing a well thought out point and insisting people understand only what you can be bothered to type. I have no sympathy for people who don’t even try, native speaker or not. I had learned some French and am becoming more fluent in Chinese, so it’s not like I’m being arrogant in this matter. I know full well what it’s like to communicate in a non-native language.

i used caps to just highlight the burning damage factor.
the point of the post is “im astonished there are people that can defend the actually DH as not being op”

That’s part of the point though. You typo’d the scaling on Burning, made it all caps, and insisted Burning had anything to do with Dragonhunter. The core Guardian is much better at Burning than the Dragonhunter and your video has nothing to do with the performance of Burning. Likewise, plenty of classes get high performance out of Burning and other conditions. It’s no surprise thata Guardian’s Burning would be high if that’s the only damaging condition they have access to. Plus, there’s the video itself where it certainly appears like the best idea you can come up with is attacking the Dragonhunter head on each time.

Fishsticks