Guild Wars 2

This is just getting comical. Half a year to spend a couple minutes changing a few values in a database somewhere to bring HoM skin pet health up to par with the pets they’re based upon, and immediately afterwards pet health is increased but it seems they forgot about the HoM ones again. We gonna be waiting another half a year for this one? White raven seems fine, at least.

Yes. Black Widow, Black Moa and Rainbow Jellyfish have less vitality than their normal equivalents after patch

White Raven is fine.

…relax, bug report, run normal skins? Or freak out, your choice.

seeing as the devs literally just fixed these pets vitality a little while ago I find this quiet funny they forgot this again.

Hilarious. Absolutely brilliant. This is the best part about the new patch so far, hands down…
:D

Wasn’t it just last patch before this one that they finally fixed that? Wow…

all this complaining and it seems like I was the only one who posted in the bug report forum, for shame

You’re on the internet, dude. You’re never the only one.

https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/support/bugs/Hall-of-Monuments-Pets-not-buffed/first#post1936497

This is what happens when your balance guy looks annoyed and defensive while talking about Rangers and like he’s about to drool when talking about Thieves. :-/

Thankfully, it’s not game-breaking and we’re in a good spot with our current viable builds.

Sebrent.3625:

This is what happens when your balance guy looks annoyed and defensive while talking about Rangers and like he’s about to drool when talking about Thieves. :-/

Thankfully, it’s not game-breaking and we’re in a good spot with our current viable builds.

It is difficult to speculate the origin of these body language things. They could be tired. They could be apprehensive due to the corrosive nature of these forums. They could be excited about giving thieves a new mechanic, after all, that is their thing: coming up with cool, viable mechanics. I wouldn’t read too much into that.

I’ll concede to you that those are also possibilities, Chopps, as long as you concede the other possibility. They are all likely possible … though the “tired” I’d say is a bit less likely since the thief suggestion from the spvp player came after Ranger talk if I remember correctly.

I can’t really fault them for having favorites. They are human and it’s just what happens. We develop stronger affinities for some things than others. I just hope it isn’t truly seeping into what gets focused on and how much care is put forth.

It could simply be that them wanting to slow down combat (yay!) makes changing thieves a much higher priority than fixing a utility type for Rangers as well as continued pet AI (plus AI likely takes longer to get “just right”).

There are things I do and don’t like. I just like to voice both ;-)

RaDiOaCtIvE.3697:

seeing as the devs literally just fixed these pets vitality a little while ago I find this quiet funny they forgot this again.

I don’t find it suprising at all. It probably means that the HoM pets are stored in the database seperately and just got overlooked, and thats probably why it took so long for the issue to be noticed and fixed the first time.

The fact that the White Raven is fine is whats really wierd.

it is weird, though they JUST fixed this, so logic would tell you that they would remember it, as it wasn’t to long ago they had to go through this. So much for that =P