Naming Violations and the gem store
Isn’t that sort of like letting speeders buy $10 doughnuts instead of getting speeding tickets?
I think ArenaNet (as well as the rest of us) would rather people just not do some of the bad things they do in the game. Players really hate not playing, so much so they’d gladly pay $10 to avoid it. That’s not much of a motivator to behave.
ArenaNet Communications Manager
Let’s be clear: You’ve chosen bad names (not borderline, not gray area) in December, January, March, and now April. On each date, multiple offensive names were identified and censored. Going through that process takes an agent more time, but we do it as a kindness, to reduce suspensions and suspension durations. Unfortunately, this extra kindness has been repaid with… more offensive names.
You also were shown benevolence—twice—in the lifting of any suspension at all. You were required only to rename your offensively-named characters. In truth, this should not have happened a second time. Which means that you should have served three suspensions and your current suspension should have been longer.
To answer your question: Offering a means for someone to buy his/her way out of an administrative action isn’t in the cards.
Lastly: I am not saying this to be rude or pejorative, but if you continue down the path of choosing rude, offensive, and sexually suggestive names, you are at great risk of permanent account termination. As I have said in the past, you need to choose wisely.
Communications Manager
Guild & Fansite Relations; In-Game Events
ArenaNet