Showing Posts Upvoted By Frostfang.5109:

Show the A-Net team some respect!!!

in Ranger

Posted by: Madtavish.9037

Madtavish.9037

And i think the whole community should show A-Net some respect. Without them you wouldn’t be even playing this game.
Now image if you are working on the class fixes, and whole class community is insulting you and demanding something, you yet cannot, but want to provide. I think anybody would say kitten this kitten and just for sake of it, would not work on those fixes anymore.

Also anyone who wants to argue :“Jon Peters said its gonna be on Nov 15Th anahshahasddsghahgdashgaggahgdsgdhasgsdhasd” then that person has to realize that A-Net aren’t group of demigods. They people. And people sometimes don’t meet deadlines. Sometimes then can’t keep up the promises. I bet anyone of you crying kitten was late to finish some work, sometime in your life. So shut up about A-net being late. I pretty sure they will provide us with the fixes you all so much desire, but everything needs time to be done.

“No matter how wonderful or wierd the weapon, what matters, it the man behind it.”

Ranger Pets are Awesome -but how about giving the player the choice for different play styles?

in Ranger

Posted by: Kirby.4951

Kirby.4951

But some players want their pets to do more dps and others don’t want to rely on their pets for dps at all. So how do we handle that? By allowing people to have the choice!

Ranger Design Adjustment

I absolutely love the ranger in GW2, having melee and ranged capabilities along with a pet allows a fun class that rises above any Ranger based class from any other game I have ever played. That being said I think the Ranger needs an adjustment to make it way more awesome. When I think pet classes I think of three main styles of play.

Play Styles

Balanced

  • Ranger and Pet do the same amount of damage
  • Both provide utility and protection

Ranger Damage

  • Ranger does most of the damage
  • You use the pet for protection and utility

Pet Damage

  • Pet does most of the damage
  • Ranger protects the pet and provides utility to the pet

This would allow the class mechanic to stay in place while providing different play styles within the class. Currently pets do a certain amount of dps almost regardless of traits. GW2 is great at allowing players to play how they want. Rangers need a little bit more of that autonomy. Players who want to do all the damage themselves and use their pet for its added utility could spec into a marksmanship style spec. If you absolutely love pets and want to be a Beastmaster when specializing in pets your pet would do most of your damage and you would provide utility to support your pet. Also players that want to play a balanced play style where you and your pet together do the same amount of damage as each other would still be able to balance the specializations and perform more balanced.

Traits

Glass Cannon

  • This spec could be full ranger and full pet damage
  • Both you and your pet would be “glass”
  • Both would do a lot of damage, both would be easy to kill

Beastmaster

  • This is where the pet would do most of the damage (roughly 80-90%)
  • Ranger would build tank or utility to support pet.

Marksman

  • The Ranger would do most the damage (same as above 80-90%)
  • Pet would provide utility to the ranger(think Protect me)

The styles of play above seem to be the idea when I look at rangers trait trees and the class as a whole. It just doesn’t seem to have enough variability. I want to address ways to give it that variety (One way is the adjustment to 80-90% of damage). With these different styles opposing players would need to identify the priority of what to kill first (pet or ranger).

Pet Stats

Pets durability are based on the Ranger’s Vitatlity and Toughness

  • Allows a Pet to be durable depending on the Ranger
  • Pets still have their own stat spreads so that you can still have a tanky pet with a glass ranger (i.e. Bear, Boar, Moa)

Pet damage is based on specialization of the pet

  • Pets damage is separate from ranger damage.

Condition damage and Healing power from the Ranger

  • This allows us to finally have pets that do good condition damage and healing. yay!

Allows the different Traits to have the effect desired without becoming overpowered (a super tanky pet that does tons of damage).

Conclusion
Ranger has the foundation to make it amazing just allow a larger division between Ranger and pet. I have spent a lot of time since launch trying to figure out how to help the ranger reach its potential. I believe this will allow the ranger to reach that potential in its class mechanic.

(edited by Kirby.4951)

Some untamable beasts...

in Ranger

Posted by: Buttercup.5871

Buttercup.5871

My absolute no.1 favorite pet of all mobs I’ve encountered thus far is:

The snow owl griffin.

Bloody awesome animal, kudos to the designer. Agree 100% with above posters to please please please please make this a charmable pet?

Pwetty please?

On a sidenote, I agree raptors are cool too. In PvP, it’d be friggin scary if one of those babies comes racing at you with 30% increased petspeed. Add a nice roar and half the work is done.

(edited by Buttercup.5871)

Fix Ranger LongBow skill Rapid Fire

in Suggestions

Posted by: JaggedOne.6934

JaggedOne.6934

This skill fires even without a target. Perhaps that is intended, but it also continues after your target dies, in the case where you do have a target. This is….kind of dumb. It should stop when the target dies, IMO.

Thanks for a fun game !!!

Saving pet names

in Ranger

Posted by: Regina Buenaobra

Regina Buenaobra

Content Marketing Lead

Thanks for the suggestion. We’re aware of this request from ranger players.

Content Marketing Lead
Twitter: @ArenaNet, @GuildWars2
In-Game Name: Cm Regina Buenaobra

New Pets: Ideas/Suggestions

in Ranger

Posted by: salt.6759

salt.6759

Skelks please!! pictured below

Also griffins and raptors would be awesome. I really like their models in game. It looks like ogres have been able to tame griffins and eagle raptors so I don’t see why we shouldn’t be able to.

Attachments:

New Pets: Ideas/Suggestions

in Ranger

Posted by: Grannysaff.5946

Grannysaff.5946

I would be most content if I could have an Alpine Stalker.

New Pets: Ideas/Suggestions

in Ranger

Posted by: jonG.8369

jonG.8369

I know some of these currently don’t exist in the game but how about -

- Gorillas/apes
- Lions
- A swarm of multiple bees, hornets, wasps & locust.
-Large praying mantis
-Prehistoric/Jurassic-like creatures.(land, air, sea)
-Snakes (cobra, boa)
-Sabertooth tiger
-Anything that is mythological or fantasy based. Just more variety than everyday normal animals we see irl would be welcome.

New Pets: Ideas/Suggestions

in Ranger

Posted by: Phantomrose.8627

Phantomrose.8627

I would love to be able to tame a dolphin for aquatic combat! I would also like to be able to tame a deer, or even a gryphon.

New Pets: Ideas/Suggestions

in Ranger

Posted by: Lonewolf Kai.3682

Lonewolf Kai.3682

I’m with you there Storm. In fact, in the book series I am writing, I’ve kept the creature true to its original name.

*Updated the list with new requests, both from this thread and another.

“Be like water” – Bruce Lee

New Pets: Ideas/Suggestions

in Ranger

Posted by: Stormdancer.4972

Stormdancer.4972

I would very much like to be able to tame griffins.

I’d also kinda like to see them renamed to gryphons. As I’ve always said – Griffon is a type of dog, Griffin is a person’s name, Gryphon is the mythical beast.

Some untamable beasts...

in Ranger

Posted by: mewt.5867

mewt.5867

I would love to have the Owl Griffins as my pet

Some untamable beasts...

in Ranger

Posted by: Riot Inducer.8964

Riot Inducer.8964

Griffins, I saw one as a ranger pet in an early video and instantly wanted one..so sad they got cut from the pet list.