Druid main, 80 on all, Legendary ranked, Eternal and all that jazz (I go by Feyris in game)
a social solution to price undercutting
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
Server: Devona’s Rest
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
Tin Foil [HATS]-Hardcore BLTC-PvP Guild
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
No they won’t. We know this for a fact because of the following:
1) There is no problem, thus no solution is needed.
2) Why spend days rewriting code to benefit one person?
In GW2, Trading Post plays you!
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
If you want a compromise, why don’t you offer to pay the devs’ salaries while they work on these changes? Since you’re the one who insists on it and will benefit from it, that’s only fair. Shouldn’t take two or three people more than a couple months to code and test it… will probably cost you about $50,000 or so, I’m sure you’ll have no problem coming up with the money.
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
No they won’t. We know this for a fact because of the following:
1) There is no problem, thus no solution is needed.
2) Why spend days rewriting code to benefit one person?
it is your opinion that it is not a problem, , (and 1 and 2 are really the exact same thing) just voice YOUR opinion dont speak for any1 else
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
No they won’t. We know this for a fact because of the following:
1) There is no problem, thus no solution is needed.
2) Why spend days rewriting code to benefit one person?
it is your opinion that it is not a problem, , (and 1 and 2 are really the exact same thing) just voice YOUR opinion dont speak for any1 else
Nobody, who posted in this topic, liked your initial proposal. Let it go.
Tin Foil [HATS]-Hardcore BLTC-PvP Guild
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
No they won’t. We know this for a fact because of the following:
1) There is no problem, thus no solution is needed.
2) Why spend days rewriting code to benefit one person?
it is your opinion that it is not a problem, , (and 1 and 2 are really the exact same thing) just voice YOUR opinion dont speak for any1 else
I don’t speak on opinions. I speak on facts derived from sound economic principals. And the current fact of all this is that the economy is working well, thus no change is needed to satisfy the opinions and needs of one person.
In GW2, Trading Post plays you!
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
No they won’t. We know this for a fact because of the following:
1) There is no problem, thus no solution is needed.
2) Why spend days rewriting code to benefit one person?
it is your opinion that it is not a problem, , (and 1 and 2 are really the exact same thing) just voice YOUR opinion dont speak for any1 else
I don’t speak on opinions. I speak on facts derived from sound economic principals. And the current fact of all this is that the economy is working well, thus no change is needed to satisfy the opinions and needs of one person.
can you please present your sound evidence that it is only the opinion of one person?
How about a compromise?
You can now buy the lowest listing (the undercutter) or the highest listing. The ones in the middle are still off limits until the ends have been bought out.
This lets you reward the only guy who didn’t undercut by buying his item first if you want to.
if we are going to allow that why not allow me to pick the one that didnt undercut by 1c, as iv said before undercutting is fine and natural and it has to be there, undercutting by 1c however….does NOT
Another shameless necro on a dead horse…
really? cuz we just started taking about compromise that sure sounds like progress to me, u mark my words anet will make a change to this feature someday and u can resist it all u want but it will come
No they won’t. We know this for a fact because of the following:
1) There is no problem, thus no solution is needed.
2) Why spend days rewriting code to benefit one person?
it is your opinion that it is not a problem, , (and 1 and 2 are really the exact same thing) just voice YOUR opinion dont speak for any1 else
I don’t speak on opinions. I speak on facts derived from sound economic principals. And the current fact of all this is that the economy is working well, thus no change is needed to satisfy the opinions and needs of one person.
can you please present your sound evidence that it is only the opinion of one person?
The fact that you are the only person in this topic that supports your suggestion is not evidence enough?
Stop necroing your own post.
Tin Foil [HATS]-Hardcore BLTC-PvP Guild
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.
I’d like to know what makes people think bumping any thread means it’s more likely to be taken seriously. I would think the opposite, especially on this thread, considering what JS has already explained many times.
I’d like to know what makes people think bumping any thread means it’s more likely to be taken seriously. I would think the opposite, especially on this thread, considering what JS has already explained many times.
what is JS? and i am not simply bumping a thread i am responding to posts when i get around to it on an issue i dont feel is settled
John Smith, the market dev.
We are heroes. This is what we do!
RIP City of Heroes
RIP City of Heroes
John Smith, the market dev.
id love to hear from him on this =p but that other post with a similar (mind you not identical) suggestion never did reach a consensus
John Smith, the market dev.
id love to hear from him on this =p but that other post with a similar (mind you not identical) suggestion never did reach a consensus
If you want an answer from JS, post in this topic:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/bltc/I-have-a-question-about-the-economy/first
Tin Foil [HATS]-Hardcore BLTC-PvP Guild
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.
Bloin – Running around, tagging Keeps, getting whack on Scoobie Snacks.