Halve the price of one-hand weapons.
This does bring up an interesting issue. Is there any good reason other than style to use 2×1-handed weapons rather than a single 1-handed weapon? Does one derive any actual benefit from doing so? Because it does cost twice as much regardless of whether you buy them or craft them. I think the cost is just sort of… negligible enough that not many people care.
You may not always wield 2 weapons, but youl always have one weapon and an off hand.
Same difference, you pay more
If that is done, then what about allowing 2-hand weapons slot a second Sigil? They are missing out on that benefit.
- (Death, Terry Pratchett, Hogfather)
Two thumbs up to you sir, or lady whichever the case may be. This makes complete logical sense to me. Half the weapon, half the price. I also agree that 2 sigils for 2h weapons makes sense.
If that is done, then what about allowing 2-hand weapons slot a second Sigil? They are missing out on that benefit.
Hadn’t actually thought of that, but it also makes sense.
Reasons for a 1 handed weapon :
+3% magic find, since you can have two traveller’s weapons.
2 sigils instead of one.
Another benefit : I don’t kick out warriors wielding two one handed axes/maces/swords/mixed anywhere near as often as I do warriors with greatswords (the rate is 100% for GS and 0% for the rest. . . Much better IMO)
(edited by GADefence.5634)