What Ranger pets should be.
No, I want an attack pet, not a buff familiar. Also your idea would call for a revamp of ranger traits and skills.
+1. I think they know about underpowered rangers and pets, and working on it.
I really want my main ranger to be equal. Elitism rising and OP classes are more accepted for PUG.
“A man chooses; a slave obeys.” | “Want HardMode? Play Ranger!”
I don’t completely agree with this suggestion.
I just wan’t slightly more control over my pet’s actions in raid situations.
Most importantly is activating f2 should NEVER send the pet attacking your target, or some random target should you not have one selected. Pet’s do already play support roles – I use condition removal on bear and regeneration on wolf in dungeons a lot. But I find the use is limited when trying to also manage where the pet is going to run off too — especially when set in PASSIVE mode.
passive should mean that, never attacking. regardless if f2 is activated or not.
I wouldn’t mind dismissing my pet for an active buff, but isn’t anywhere near as important as an upgrade being made to passive / f2.