WvWvW Orb Solution!
Your entire idea is flawed. Not to be mean or rude or whatever. The entire point of removing it, is that the winning team, becomes more powerful, and then becomes even harder to beat. If anything it should be the opposite. The less you own, the more powerful you become so that you can come back and put up a fight. No one likes to be on the side where the other team has 90% of the map, and they are 50% more powerful that you now so you cant take anything back.
Your entire idea is flawed. Not to be mean or rude or whatever. The entire point of removing it, is that the winning team, becomes more powerful, and then becomes even harder to beat. If anything it should be the opposite. The less you own, the more powerful you become so that you can come back and put up a fight. No one likes to be on the side where the other team has 90% of the map, and they are 50% more powerful that you now so you cant take anything back.
He said he would do exactly that. The edit proved it even if you had been confused the the post.
I think your idea is awesome Fancy. It would help colors not get totally extinguished even on there own borderlands.
I think inverse bonuses starts to sound good, but I think it can lead to too much of an artificially caused equilibrium. Personally, I’d like to see this implemented on a trial basis. I think if it will work, it’d work very well, or it would not work at all and cause that artificially induced state, one extreme or the other.
Thanks for all your responses so far. I believe that this mechanic of inversely-scaled bonuses can offer a team or teams back from defeat back to a level playing field. The current trend i see with match-ups is that the team that leads 24 hours after the initial reset, wins hands-down.
Personally, I’d like to see this implemented on a trial basis. I think if it will work, it’d work very well, or it would not work at all and cause that artificially induced state, one extreme or the other.
Tera GX, what extremes are you talking about if i may ask? thanks in advance for your reply.
I was referring to one extreme being that it will work very well, the other extreme being it failing and causing an excessive unwanted equilibrium. I don’t think there will be a middle ground.