world exploration

world exploration

in Suggestions

Posted by: Expendable.8613

Expendable.8613

I would like to see you take the world vs world component out of this player vs environment achievement , personally I very much dislike pvp, and play your game for the world events, the exploring and the enjoyment of playing with my friends. I have just finished exploring the entire map only to find that I am being told no no you have only explored 92% of said world now you have to go into WvW and get yourself ganked over and over. So my suggestion is if you are going to have an achievement that is very much a player vs environment please keep it as such.

world exploration

in Suggestions

Posted by: Pure Heart.1456

Pure Heart.1456

“The Mists” are a part of the world environment. Logically, it should be included.

But I see your point. I would suggest taking your group of friends in with you to acquire those remaining points.

world exploration

in Suggestions

Posted by: Expendable.8613

Expendable.8613

No they are not part of the world environment because if they were part of the world environment I would not have to access them using the interface at the top of the screen. If they were part of the world, I would be able to walk there.

world exploration

in Suggestions

Posted by: Pure Heart.1456

Pure Heart.1456

By “part of the world environment”, I meant that “The Mists” exist within the same ‘world’ (universe) that Guild Wars 2 is set in. Therefore, it is logical that a 100% exploration achievement be given to those who have in fact, explored 100% of the ‘world’.

world exploration

in Suggestions

Posted by: Nidome.1365

Nidome.1365

Umm, actually you can walk there, there are Asura gates in Lions Arch leading to each WvW map.
Also I have managed to get completion on all four maps with a level 22 alt without being ganked by another player once (although I did die to a load of dolls where someone had opened the present at the Stonemist Vista). Basically I saw the WvW maps as a quick way to extra skill points at low level.