Hello,
I found this interesting and very sad article i would like to share with you. I feel it is important to address what’s in the article because it is key problem that still exist in guild wars 2;
especially with the wvw server match ups.
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/wuv/wuv/Unfair-matchups
“Unfair Match-ups”
I greatly sympathize the new players, non-hardcore player and the guilds; who are still struggling or simply ‘just given up’ because of it.
They are denied entry because they don’t have the best top armors, weapons, runes and sigils. Or, not belonging to a top server/s, guilds or a specific class.
Although we are all valuable players,.
We’ve all seen the depressing messages on the LFG tool;
- ‘no babies allowed’
-‘no newbies allowed’
-‘will kick if you are weak’
-‘only elitists allowed;
-’only heavy d/d zerk allowed’
-‘you die, kick’
-‘no___ class/s allowed’
As the saying goes, “what happens next, tells the true story”
http://spinksville.wordpress.com/2013/02/25/can-hardcore-players-destroy-a-mmo/
“I bet anyone who ever played a massively multiplayer online game has come up against the scenario where you realise that someone you are playing with (or against) is putting way more time, effort, research and social networking into the game than you are.
Maybe it’s That Guy who undercuts all your glyph auctions half a second after you have posted them. Every single time.
Maybe it’s the really powerful and organised alliance who seem to have a zillion players in every timezone.
Maybe it’s The Guy in your raid group (or LFR) who is all geared and tweaked out and times his/her rotation to the millisecond.
It’s easy to feel demoralised if you are competitive and you see a situation where you know you don’t want to put in the time/ money/ effort to compete with that. This is one of the big structural problems with MMOs: how do you have a game where a wide variety of players can all play together without breaking the game? Do you encourage the hardcore players/ guilds to be part of a separate more hardcore endgame? Do you encourage players to play alongside others of similar mindset and give them separate instances to mess around in?
Gevlon has a good take on this in a post about RMT where he muses that if you let players cash out their earnings from the auction house, it would attract a more professional crowd (note: his opinion of professionals is a bit higher than mine).
What effect would it have on the game? Every market fully covered, leaving no trading income to casual/newbie players, only similar professional traders could compete. The simpler income sources, like doing PvE would be covered by real world corporations using minimal wage labor (after all, ratting can be done by half-illiterates), leaving absolutely no in-game income source to the real players.
He even decided to cut back on his own trading, “giving more space to other players to play in Jita”. This isn’t a case where the hardcore would be destroying the economy, it would still function fine. Just there is a theoretical case where there are enough ultra competitive players to mean that there are no niches left for casuals in that side of the game.
There are other theoretical ways in which the ultra hardcore could push a game into a stasis from which it could never escape. You could imagine a turf holding game where all the turf ends up belonging to a few large alliances who have mutual non aggression pacts.
The only way out would be if the ruling alliances deliberately cut back on their expansionary plans (much like Gevlon describes in his trading) in order to promote a more ‘healthy’ ecosystem in the game. Where ‘healthy’ could mean anything from ‘more welcoming to new players’ to ‘more likely to give us some fun territory fights in the future.’
In a themepark game, this is all largely irrelevant (I think it’s mostly theoretical in most sandboxes too). There simply are fewer parts of the game where players would have this much control that a large powerful guild could simply win the game. But it’s interesting I think to compare with RL – sometimes looking to the long term good of the community might be worth more than going for pure domination.
Have you ever played a game where you felt you or your faction dominated so hard that it wasn’t fun any more, or where you gave up because you felt the hardcore players meant there was no point?"
(edited by Burnfall.9573)