Guild Wars 2

I would like, if the community could agree on an acronym, we can use in lfg, that means the following:

1) All must have berserk’er gear

2) Party composition must be 2 elementalists, 1 guardian, 1 thief and 1 ps war (sometimes, depending on the dungeon, the guardian can be replaced by a mesmer).

3) Dungeon tactics must be semi record runs, so it’s ok to kill champs/bosses that would normally be skipped on record runs and to get chests that would also normally be skipped, and it’s ok not to use portal, if the guard is replaced by a mesmer..

4) People MUST know aggro mechanics, fx for pathing mobs in stealth, and the like.

5) Anyone that turns out not to respect/fullfill any of the above will be kicked.

So, what should we agree on? I suggest MOBO for no particular reason. So the lfg would for example look like this:

fullrun, MOBO

moboring.

You should add in something saying they should have read the LFG, too.

That way when they join and are clueless, you can tell them the LFG acronym they didn’t know about and violated was also violated because they didn’t read the LFG and joined anyway.

Additionally, are you saying that I wouldn’t be welcomed if I joined and wanted to play a condition Guardian? Or would it be okay if I played a condi guard in zerk instead of sinister?

I could troll on, but this is pointless. Sorry.

“lf guild run”

I could add more text, specifying the requirements, but I didn’t, because it’s pretty obvious what I mean, to the people I want to address.That’s why I haven’t mentioned gearcheck, runes, traits, sigils, food, etc.

I just want to be able to use an acronym, because the lfg text we are allowed to enter, doesn’t allow us to describe the above (too few characters allowed).

I expect people will start discussing (troll) the thread, by saying ’that’s not a good party combo’, ‘The people join the lfg anyway without reading the text’, ‘They can just ping some gear and use something else’, ‘Join a dungeon guild’, etc and so on. But that’s irrelevant wrt finding an acronym imo.

At the moment, people use the word META, which imo means what I wrote in the first post. But because of the different opinions about what META means, I would like us (= the people that want a semi record run via lfg) to use a more unambiguous acronym.

Why u doin this? People join lfgs without reading, it’s pointless. Also, many would just pretend to have read and have somekindofmetagear, ping – then wear something else.

That’s not a good party combo, by the way.

.. you need a guild and/or friends, if you manage. Or lower your pug expectations.

Exp meta builds only ping API key on join so we can check your gear and build

naked only bring muffins

I might be wrong but how about “meta”

I think you should just join a guild to run dungeons with if this matters so much to you.

no, the standard meta is up for debate anyway and isn’t always the fastest way. you can easily type requirements in the space provided anyway. plus pugging is a good source of dynamic combat

Have “ping traits on join” lfgs started popping up yet? I’d check but that would require logging in to the game. :<

Zui.9245:

You should add in something saying they should have read the LFG, too.

“Lfg blah blah 2+2*2=?”

sorenrye.7238:

I would like us (= the people that want a semi record run via lfg) to use a more unambiguous acronym.

If you want semi record runs, the LFG tool is not the right place.
Stop QQing, join a guild, ez

Just use lfg for fun, that’s all it’s good for

J Eberle.9312:

Just use lfg for fun, that’s all it’s good for

Or to hook up. I’ve seen some “lf girlfriend” posts before. I’m sure one could also do “lf friends”?

deSade.9437:

J Eberle.9312:

Just use lfg for fun, that’s all it’s good for

Or to hook up. I’ve seen some “lf girlfriend” posts before. I’m sure one could also do “lf friends”?

bladex.9502:

deSade.9437:

J Eberle.9312:

Just use lfg for fun, that’s all it’s good for

Or to hook up. I’ve seen some “lf girlfriend” posts before. I’m sure one could also do “lf friends”?

Good one

Since the discussion in this thread has derailed and is no longer constructive this thread is now closed.