Am i the only one?
It’s not really a secret that it’s set up like this because ANet wants you to buy more from the gemstore…That said they’ve been much cooler about this than they get credit for. What with all/most gemstore items being account wide (gathering tools used to be soulbound), the wallet (freeing up much space in bank and making karma/gold management way easier), wardrobe so you don’t have to hold on to excessive amounts of gemstore skins (again saving space), minis and dyes made account wide so you don’t have to buy duplicates, ascended/legendary gear being account bound rather than soulbound, etc.
Don’t get me wrong, I would like to see more stuff become account wide (I’m looking at you bag slots), but there’s just so much ANet can cut into their profit. And $ rules, so I doubt it’ll happen until the amount of unsatisfied customers starts to threaten sales too much, or the change is projected to increase profits.
It’s not really a secret that it’s set up like this because ANet wants you to buy more from the gemstore…That said they’ve been much cooler about this than they get credit for. What with all/most gemstore items being account wide (gathering tools used to be soulbound), the wallet (freeing up much space in bank and making karma/gold management way easier), wardrobe so you don’t have to hold on to excessive amounts of gemstore skins (again saving space), minis and dyes made account wide so you don’t have to buy duplicates, ascended/legendary gear being account bound rather than soulbound, etc.
Don’t get me wrong, I would like to see more stuff become account wide (I’m looking at you bag slots), but there’s just so much ANet can cut into their profit. And $ rules, so I doubt it’ll happen until the amount of unsatisfied customers starts to threaten sales too much, or the change is projected to increase profits.
In regards to gathering tools, I’d like to be able to equip them on more than one character at the same time. Since they’re account bound, I can go to a bank and move them from character to character so it’s not like I’m not going to buy multiples of each, especially not at 1000g a shot. I see no reason we should not be able to equip them on multiple characters since we cannot play multiple characters at any given time and it only takes a minute to run to the bank and switch them over. Buying more than one of each is a huge waste of gems.
Bags not so much. Bag expansions should be on a per character basis, IMO.
It would be nice, but the price would probably go up. I prefer to be able to give these item to a specific character in that case.
Yes If the price stay at the same level, I’m all for account wide. But this won’t happen so.
You can only play one character at a time. The pick is account bound. You have a bank. If some whales want to buy multiple picks to avoid the (imo) very minor inconvenience of having to take a minute to offload the pick to the bank and then load it on another character, then let them.
It would be nice, but the price would probably go up. I prefer to be able to give these item to a specific character in that case.
Yes If the price stay at the same level, I’m all for account wide. But this won’t happen so.
They’re already account wide and should not increase in price…it’s just a manual step to move them from one character to another. It would not be a great deal of work to make them account usable without having to move them from character to character manually. With an account wide wallet, wardrobe, stat bonus’, etc., the framework is already there and could be added in a similar fashion to minis or outfits….which can be shared by multiple characters at once. I suppose what it comes down to is how many people are actually buying multiples for their alts.