Guild Wars 2

Lots of good changes, glad about the warrior ones, as for eles lets see how it goes,

I would say arcane is the one that needs the most focusing, traits that is, specially Blasting staff, glad is was moved down, it definitely opens up more options. Definitely will be looking forward to this.

What I lvoed the most was the clarity and reasoning of each changes, thank you for that!

This actually looks very nice. If (IF) the ele and ranger changes make it in, that’s huge. Still nothing to address ranger 1H sword, but I’ll take what I can get.

Ranger sword 1 still rooting?
Why should i get 300 points in precision and 30% more critical damage if i want to use traps?

screams at more than few of the Ranger changes MY BODY IS READY!

Lévis.5489:

Ranger sword 1 still rooting?
Why should i get 300 points in precision and 30% more critical damage if i want to use traps?

Maybe they’ll up the physical (direct, even) damage on traps, for those of us who run power builds.

The 1H sword thing, yeah, that’s bad, and it’s still being ignored. Still, if these changes make it in, this is the single best patch for rangers since release.

Also, anything that addresses the sad state of the ele is just good.

Unspec foes for warrior trait should be instead reduced to 15% crit chance . Because it will allow builds with an already high crit chance to get benefit from it . But otherwise pretty good nerfs , now we have to choose between cleansing ire and bursy matery

But please arenanet don’t touch my thief
Shadow return is useless now or what

good change to symbol of swiftness but can we have pure of voice removes 2 condi back?

JonPeters.5630:

Warrior:
…We don’t mind warriors doing massive damage, or doing great area of effect control…

Well, good thing I already started re-rolling warrior. Still on the fence though as which is better warrior or guard…
(Going from thief to warrior.)

A right step on the Guardian changes IMO, but why is Kindled Zeal still condition damage? Guardians only have access to burning which isn’t very good by itself.

DO NOT change :

Shadow Arts V – Infusion of Shadow – This trait functionality has been changed to “Gain initiative when you enter stealth.” 2 init.

This is a horrendous idea. I don’t even main thief, but you’re going to nerf numerous builds into the ground. Thieves will go from being alright to being completely garbage tier with this change.

Honestly, take it or leave it, but it’s a bad idea.

In my eyes, these are some major changes! I especially like the elementalist preview.

When these are released, will we have our traits reset or do we have to buy another manual to re-trait?

Guys stop QQing , the hammer is still fairly strong with a DPS build . Stop being a little rabbit and running with soldier gear . Learn to use a burst set for god sake .

Trollmacht.4105:

kittening great job, finally you removed the warrior class from the game.
have fun at all the engeniers necros and rangers out there wtfstopmping everything again.
to bad a net has no balls and obviously doesnt play this game with their 2 man class balance team but instead listens on the pve crowd who cries the loudest

Ask for these changes to not hit sPvP if you want them to not be nerfed there. Don’t just complain, help make constructive criticisms so they’ll know what not to change for sPvP, but can change elsewhere.

The first decent patch in months.

Keep up the good work!

Generally, this looks really good! Nice work

I main warrior and thief. It’s a sad but rightious day.

The tanky warrior build is defy dead for roaming now. Damage is just going to be too low. With a zerker set it should still be okey, i hope. And it will still be viable for large scale WvW most likely.

For thief, d/p won’t be as popular anymore. Luckily i play d/d so i welcome the improved initiative gain.

heal signet!! zerker stance!! no nefrs?? ………….. but ye nerf engi’s vigor – gg ((

Very excited about these changes, especially the Ranger, even though guardian is my main (nice to see more damage for guards) I know Rangers have needed some love for a while.

Jikuim.1349:

DO NOT change :

Shadow Arts V – Infusion of Shadow – This trait functionality has been changed to “Gain initiative when you enter stealth.” 2 init.

This is a horrendous idea. I don’t even main thief, but you’re going to nerf numerous builds into the ground. Thieves will go from being alright to being completely garbage tier with this change.

Honestly, take it or leave it, but it’s a bad idea.

Personally, I don’t mind since perma stealth isn’t THAT great. The 33% boost to initiative regen is a fair exchange in my opinion. It will really benefit builds like S/P and D/D. Most D/P thieves don’t play 10/30/30/0/0 in tournament play, and that build is pure cheese in WvW and quit frustrating to many players.

Nix.3152:

heal signet!! zerker stance!! no nefrs?? ………….. but ye nerf engi’s vigor – gg ((

Even though it’s somethingthat bothers me a lot, i think it was necessary. No one should be able to gain a boon like vigor w/o a cooldown.

As far as the Ele changes I think they sound like the right direction. Allowing people to still get the weapon traits in the Arcane tree and reducing the cooldown of attunement changing to make it more manageable without speccing purely into 30 Arcane is very nice. This was definitely my biggest want in change for Ele in terms of trait changes for a long time, as I’m sure it was others.

I became very used to max Arcane and some of the Traits so I will definitely be looking forward to seeing how I can change my Trait set up now though.

Healing signet needs NO NERF , don’t listen to the whiner . Warrior has no sustain outside of high regen . Those hammer dmg nodes nerf are perfect . But im dissapointed about thief changes honestly , S\D is the only viable build anet

This thread as a great step forward. Not only are you giving the community a chance to provide feedback on the proposed changes, but you’re also explaining what guiding principles are motivating the changes for each class. Bravo!

Any chance that you could take another step forward in this area and provide a test server with early access to patches? While providing advance notice of changes is a big help, sometimes it’s hard for players to understand how those changes will affect gameplay especially in pvp settings where many things can interact in unexpected ways, so having the ability to test out the changes would go even farther towards inviting the players to assist you in providing the highest quality game play experience.

One more thing bow rangers really need: merge Piercing Arrows with ANY other bow trait – 20% CD reduction or Eagle Eye, or at least add something more to this trait.

JonPeters.5630:

Necromancer:
_For the necromancer, we felt that a few traits and skills were too powerful, while others were lacking in efficacy. We brought down some of the raw DPS conditions that necromancer enjoys, while also maintaining their pressure and sustain elements. The necromancer’s mobility will remain where it is currently, as we want the Necromancers to be focused on sustaining themselves through death shroud, siphoning health, and slowing down their opponent’s ability to act.

Perhaps the place where the efforts should be focused is on the Dhuumfire trait, rather than removing a bleed stack here and there. Given the introduction of this trait was what pushed necros into the overbearing condition burst they are now, it seems the logical place to focus balancing efforts.

Rather than get rid of the trait, changing it to inflict Torment instead of Burning would have many positive effects.

1. 4 stacks of Torment is roughly the same damage as Burning if the target is moving. However, unlike Burning, Torment stacks can be adjusted in intensity without affecting far more than just the troublesome trait. If the damage remains too high, reducing it to 3 stacks of Torment is quite doable.

2. Torment is already in the condition necromancer’s burst rotation/arsenal. As such, adding more stacks will not make a negative difference on cleansing potential of condition removal skills against a necromancer’s burst. In fact, by removing burning, you improve the capability of other classes to cleanse the damaging conditions as one fewer slot is being taken up.

3. Torment already has built-in counterplay to mitigate the damage output. Even if cleansing the stacks is impractical in a situation, not moving at least limits the damage received.

4. In the PvE environment, Dhuumfire is close to a useless trait as any foes where the extra damage is really desired will usually already be burning, usually from Guardians and Elementalists that cause it as a side-effect. This would allow condition necromancers to contribute more in PvE, which is currently their weakest area.

5. If the necromancer and a burning user are both targeting the same opponent in PvP or WvW, the total damage output will be increased. However, the counterplay will be exactly the same. This is a good thing, actually, as a single foe being targeted by multiple opponents should have a significantly harder time surviving. In a PvP environment, however, you either have a 2v2 with one player getting focused by his opponents, or you have a 2v1 and one person free to capture points or create a different 2v1 elsewhere.

6. Many Necromancer players have been asking for better access to Torment. At the same time, many are displeased with the introduction of Burning. This change would satisfy both complaints.

I believe this would prove more effective at reigning in condition necro damage than removing bleed stacks off of skills. Having one more axis of adjustment, reducing required cleanses, and using something with built-in counterplay for the “burst” damage will all improve the situation.

First of all: The idea to create more transparency and to make the players understand what the thought behind the changes is, is great! I’ve been waiting for this for a long time

My thoughts on the thief changes:
- the general change to initiative gain is good imo.
- i’m happy that pistol whip gets some love. We will see if it will be enough to make the set viable again
- hard to catch is still a very bad trait, since it gets you in trouble/messes up your positioning more often than it saves you.
- assasin’s reward still won’t be worth taking
- nerfing shadow return is understandable, since it was a “no-brainer” and the thief could get out of trouble too easily
- but simultaneously nerfing endurance gain through halving vigor uptime is very, very bad. Normally a thief doesn’t take vigorous recovery and bountiful theft at the same time. After the change the thief would be able to dodge less than most other classes with acces to permanent vigor uptime, although the thief is considered to be the most evasive class in the game.

My proposal: either nerf shadow return or vigor uptime, but not both. “Shaving” means to tone down something step by step. Halving vigor uptime seems a bit drastic to me, especially along with the other changes wich affect the sword thief.

“Guards: Symbol of Swiftness: This skill now applies 4 seconds of swiftness per pulse, rather than 8 seconds if you have no swiftness and 1 second if you have swiftness.”
That’s a sucky change. Not only are you not “fixing” the addition of swiftness from the symbol if you already have swiftness, you are reducing the base swiftness applied?

How is this helping your stated goal of “We do feel that damage guardians are not as powerful as they could be.” An extra 4s of AOE swiftness would have made them OP? Biggest issue for damage guards is in-combat mobility. Adding more damage isn’t helping you if you can’t catch what you are trying to hit.

If at least the 4s would stack additively for the duration of the field it would still serve some support roles, like speeding up yaks.

The one thing I would want to see changed for a thief is for them to come out of stealth while spiking. Unless your class has a AOE knock back or move ability in the downed state a thief can spike you from stealth 100% and you can’t do anything about it.

My reasons are that when a thief goes into stealth they should not be able to do any damage. they are going into stealth to gain a situation advantage, then they come out of stealth to do the damage. stealth spiking just feels like cheating and I feel cheated when it happens to me.

Any chance you will review the Backstab damage? Perhaps move it to other skills and give HS a small 1 sec internal CD. Right now it is very unfair to be hit by 8-9k in PvP even wearing defensive traits/armor, and 14-15k in WvW unbuffed. I dont have a problem with thieves having burst, only that having the strongest hitting spell on the game without any counter is not very much fun to deal with.

The mesmer buff marks the return of 12-second phantasms. Along with Mender’s Purity removing two conditions, are you sure that is wise? It is true that Mesmers do need help in sPvP, but Illusionists Celerity has always felt like a problem-trait, along with Deceptive Evasion.

I am absolutely loving what I’m reading, I’ve disagreed with so many nerfs to thieves but these were NECESSARY. Perma stealth was a real issue (in WvW), I’m not sure I’m liking the Vigor nerfs tho. :/

The only reason I’m even surviving with my thief is due to outdodging damage, this will completely destroy my build which I didn’t think is OP at all. I hope some of these nerfs come with some good survivability buffs too.. and D/D definitely needs a buff or two.

well you will never see a thief with a sword again. gg.

Bravo on finally addressing thief base initiative regeneration. I’ve been suggesting that be looked into for quite a while.

However, part of the point of doing so was to remove the reliance on so many initiative based traits, and instead replace them with effects that make the class feel more varied and unique, instead of traits that just let us use our abilities at an effective pace. Why keep all the init based traits and just reduce their effectiveness? This is especially aggravating for the minor traits, which you can’t avoid taking if you go into that trait line.

It looks like most specs will stay almost exactly the same, perhaps switching out Quick recovery (which now tentatively looks like crap for a master tier trait) with Assassin’s reward (which now looks much better).

Why not update some of those init based traits (Quick recovery, opportunist, kleptomaniac) with effects which actually help define the playstyle?

Concerning Pistol Whip – I obviously can’t test it, but it still seems like players will Still be able to walk/dodge roll out of the second half of the damaging portion of the skill. I’m not asking that the stun lock the player down for the full effect, but there has to be some point into using PW besides for forcing the opposing player to dodge out of the last half of the swings. It seems like it needs more of a re-design than a tweak at this point.

Instead of a .25s cast time on Infiltrators Return, just lock it down when CC’d You’ll achieve the same effect without ruining the fluidity of play that sword relies on. Regardless of which you go with, I think it’s a silly choice, but if you’re determined to further limit S/D, please do it in the smartest way possible

JonPeters.5630:

We don’t like classes having permanent Vigor, and this is one of the areas we needed to tone down the up time of the engineer’s Vigor.

From the top of my head and I might be wrong here. But ele’s, mesmers and even guardians can easily get perma vigor. Why take it away from engineers and not from them?

I’ll deal with the loss, but I do believe this change is uncalled for.

Thanks for the ranger changes.

There are 3 identical vigour traits for ele, gua and mes. Guardian and mesmer have that traits as’ 5 minor traits while elementalist will have it at 20 points. What is the logic behind that, especially when an elementalist is the squishiest of those?

nightwing.2179:

In my eyes, these are some major changes! I especially like the elementalist preview.

When these are released, will we have our traits reset or do we have to buy another manual to re-trait?

It only costs like 3 silver to reset traits at 80. I do it every couple of weeks.

I play a raw damage ranger focusing on marksmanship and skirmishing. I love:
a) Changes to Long Range Shot
b) Marksmanship V- Predator’s Instinct.

The unintended consequence is that you now have too many must have options in the marksmanship line and the potential solution is that you should offload a few to skirmishing adapt.

The missing trait change is tied to giving us out of combat swiftness to free up a pvp and wvw slot versus taking Signet of the Hunt.

Explanations:

1) The issue of an overloaded marksmanship line.

Right now you have for Tier 1 +10% damage and the new Predator.

Tier 2 Piercing Arrows or Spotter and Eagle Eye. So often you wind up going grandmaster in marksmanship to fit in that third trait.

Could you move a trait like piercing arrows to the skirmishing adept line? Or replace Trapper’s Instinct with the new Predator’s Instinct?

2) The issue of lack of out of combat speed.

For PvP and WvW, rangers often take Signet of the Hunt just to keep up out of combat. That is a whole slot for out of combat movement. Could you make a simple change to tail wind and make it apply swiftness even when we are not in combat much like the engineer’s speedy kits? Doesn’t need to be a trait you choose because the buff ONLY occurs out of combat (and allows us to travel at a good speed when not in a group).

Other Stuff:

1) Nature IX Two Handed Training is supposed to help give us fury but we have lots of options for fury (almost as many as we had for endurance regen). One of the most common is the 9 seconds on weapon swap. GS is often used with a LB in a power oriented build. You range then swap/leap/maul. So for a longer fight you might get a bit of fury with the new trait. Might be better to provide might upon a crit and change the cooldowns. Not bad, but you might want something other than fury.

I don’t understand your note on Nature X at all. Can you explain?

Mighty swap only applies the might to the ranger and not the condition damage? Would be more versatile if it did both. You tend to one one or the other (condition v raw builds).

I like what this does for PvP and WvW balance, but I don’t like how zero consideration is given to what this does for PvE.

I watched the Ranger stream today and Izzy talked about condition builds being viable in PvE and dungeons like that was really a thing. I am sure ANet plays GW2, so I am sure they have, at least on occasion, played a dungeon with non-ANet players. As such, I’m confident that you guys understand how bad condition builds are and how bad many classes are in general for PvE. Little to no consideration is being given here to balance in that vein in PvE, and that repeated disregard for an entire branch of the game is pretty unfortunate.

For instance, you keep talking about how Guardian power builds are “weak”. If you pay attention closely to dungeon runs, you’ll find that Guardians already do among the best raw power-based DPS of any class in the game right up there with Eles and Mesmers packing FGS. And here you are giving them a free bonus 5% damage in a trait that already gets used frequently in PvE? That makes them even more invaluable to runs. Where are the Necromancer power-build buffs for PvE? Make Close To Death (Spite XII) give +30% damage in PvE only, make Dhuumfire a 6s burn in PvE instead of a 4s Burn, make Siphoned Power (Spite 25) give 5 stacks of might instead of 1 and make its threshold 33%. Engineers in PvE actually see some love with that Modified Ammunition change, but it’d still be nice if they could get a bit more. Juggernaut could use some PvE love, among other things. The poor Thief is demolished by this patch in PvE, seeing as now it can’t layer stealth for initiative and it hasn’t gotten any positive dps or support buffs (it got nerfs instead actually) to compensate.

I really want to emphasize that while these changes are great for other formats, PvE is just being left behind and the dungeon meta is, quite frankly, disappointing at the moment. You guys (ANet) really need to put some thought into how this affects them and what you can do to improve the build and class diversity used there.

Seriously, it’d be nice to actually have a reason to use my Necromancer in a dungeon for once. You could flat increase the effect of condition damage in PvE by 50% and it still wouldn’t compare to most power-based builds.

gg, warriors back to bunker build being the only viable build if this goes through…
Either glassy for PvE where in PvP you will get kited and destroyed before you even reach the enemy.
Or bunker up and not be able to kill anything….

I can understand why you’d move Unsuspecting Foe around, but does the direct damage on hammer really need to be nerfed? It already hits like a soggy weenie, and about as slowly to boot. Add in other class’ damage mitigation and hammer doesn’t seem to do much anymore.

If thief sword is going to get a cast time for infiltrator’s return, would it be possible to look into flanking strike and larcenous strike again? Ever since it was nerfed to only steal one boon, I find myself almost never using it, due to the fact that boon durations are generally very short, they are re-applied very easily, and there’s no control whatsoever on which boon you will be stealing anyways.

I do agree that it was too powerful at 2 boons stolen per larcenous strike, but I find it far too weak at 1 boon stolen… do you think the skill could be modified in some other fashion so that it’s not such a waste of initiative anymore?

i like all of those changes but as a main class Thief i’m just absolutelly happy about the changes on the class.