Fake leaked patch notes?
there is no way to know, you said it yourself that arena net won’t tell it.. so i think you have an answer…
what difference does it make to know before patch?
Join the Rainbow Pride
real, not final version.
I kind of think they are an intended “leak” to get feedback from the community so they can fine tune things before release.
I think they are fake.
1) Excluding the few “general updates”, everything else are profession updates. No WvW notes, no PvE notes, no PvP notes, no content notes. Very unusual and likely a reason to consider them fake.
2) Updates to traits have been separated into subsections of the corresponding traits lines. To my knowledge, this hasn’t happened before.
3) There is too much rebalancing and too many changes to the professions.
“Dear ANet, nerf Paper, Scissors is fine. Sincerely, Rock”
Elysaurus | Warrior | [LOL] | League of the Legendary | Gandara (EU)
I think they are fake.
1) Excluding the few “general updates”, everything else are profession updates. No WvW notes, no PvE notes, no PvP notes, no content notes. Very unusual and likely a reason to consider them fake.
2) Updates to traits have been separated into subsections of the corresponding traits lines. To my knowledge, this hasn’t happened before.
3) There is too much rebalancing and too many changes to the professions.
They’re real enough. Anet opened a discussion forum to discuss them. If they were fake, there’d be no reason for them to do it. They’d simply say they’re fake. If they’re not talking, they’re real.
They’re probably not the final notes however.
I think they are fake.
1) Excluding the few “general updates”, everything else are profession updates. No WvW notes, no PvE notes, no PvP notes, no content notes. Very unusual and likely a reason to consider them fake.
2) Updates to traits have been separated into subsections of the corresponding traits lines. To my knowledge, this hasn’t happened before.
3) There is too much rebalancing and too many changes to the professions.
They’re real enough. Anet opened a discussion forum to discuss them. If they were fake, there’d be no reason for them to do it. They’d simply say they’re fake. If they’re not talking, they’re real.
They’re probably not the final notes however.
Link to that discussion forum?
Gunnar’s Hold
It’s seven pages already, being discussed for a couple of days. I doubt Anet wouldn’t have said anything if it weren’t real…in fact, they merged threads about it.
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/gw2/Balance-changes
I feel the same, if those notes werent real at all Anet would have said that.
It might be an intentional, not-finished list of changes, so to get some feedback to do some tweaks right before the actual patch.
In conclusion they are probably not the final version we will actually see, anyway i hope it will be close to that + something more, it would finally be a patch worth of the name.
They’re probably not the final notes however.
They aren’t the final version. The leaked version calls the new DS 5 skill Dark Binding, while the official upcoming changes page refers to it as Tainted Shackles.
The patch notes are a good indication of where they are going though, and I expect we’ll see a lot of what they’ve written there.
its a good thing that they’re reviewing, rechecking, retesting, rewriting everything before the final release. better than a rushed re-balance release that makes a rise in the sea of sorrow’s water with tyrians tears.
I’m talking about this http://pastebin.com/2rrFg9pS
Other topics about the same subject have been deleted (or “Moved to trashcan”). Expect the same to happen to yours. Apparently ArenaNet doesn’t want people to check that link.
treadmill, of being in that obvious pattern of every time I catch up you are going to
put another carrot in front of me” – Mike O’Brien right before Ascended weapons
- they’re real, but not the final version.
You got that one right, I believe.
Hi everyone,
Please refer to this thread where we are discussing this topic
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/gw2/Balance-changes
Thanks for your understanding.
This thread is closed.