Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Khal Drogo.9631

Khal Drogo.9631

Q:

I estimate mine to be 100+. Maybe even much more – just dont keep track.

Apologies to those who may find my posts on GW2 forums offensive and hateful.

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Never.8571

Never.8571

I got two hoards within a week of each other. A good few months before that without one, and it’s been about 2 months of almost daily kills without another.

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: bri.2359

bri.2359

At least 200 kills here, no hoard yet …

Lvl 80’s: Ranger; Guardian; Mesmer; Necromancer; Thief
Gandara Megaserver

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: pessimist.7294

pessimist.7294

Have been killing him since he got reworked, over 150 times and still no hoard

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: ToT.7018

ToT.7018

Maybe about 30 times no hoard, guildie at weekend only done it a few times got the hoard and 2 exotics in one try.

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Soren.9316

Soren.9316

I would estimate I’m up around 750-800 tries with no hoard…. I am however really proficient at getting runes or the useless =p

IGN: Soren the Always Lost
Gaiscioch Family [GSCH]

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Phoenixlin.8624

Phoenixlin.8624

I haven’t got hoard since they buffed Tequatl ^^

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Yargesh.4965

Yargesh.4965

probably a couple of hundred. At least a hundred wurm with no regurgitation (could be a good thing) either.

Highest number of Teq kills without Hoard?

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: moonlightseal.6927

moonlightseal.6927

Got my Hoard after about 30 or so. Seems reasonable

Back To Top