I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: DTereau.2590

DTereau.2590

Before I begin, let me say that I don’t want to support either candidate, I play games to get away from politics and other real-world issues and venom they bring, but here’s how I view the candidates:

Ellen Kiel is apparently the morally “good” and “for the people” candidate, as we have seen in southsun cove where she frees the refugees from the legal trickery used by the consortium, and how she intends to return the possesions stolen by the aetherblades to the rightful owners(candidate trials), her interest in fractal research seems to be more in using it as a tool for future disaster prevention (using the fractals to gain more information on what caused the thaumanova reactor to meltdown, to prevent it happening again), as well as investigate the inquest’s activities further.

Evon Gnashblade is the more typical “buisnessman” politician, by appealing to people’s greed (slashing prices of black lion keys), he is prepared to use stolen property to fund his election campaign (he says as much at the beggining of candidate trials), his interest in the fractals is either historical, personal, or more in the interest of the Charr to better understand humanity (It wasn’t long before Abbadon’s “fall” that humans first gained magic, this would be an interesting point for Charr to know about, as it was the human’s powerful magic that made them dominant in that time, it would also tell the Charr what sort of power it would take to kill the human gods.)

Now, I didn’t think it was going to work very well when I first saw the signs during Dragon Bash, but after the addition of cutthroat politics I can see something very nasty coming about in the community.

Seriously Anet, don’t ever do this again. As interesting a social experiment it may be, it creates a very hostile environment in the game, as people frequently argue over political candidates and their choices, much like they do in real life, and I have even seen real life political situations discussed in game, this is not a suitable environment to simply play and enjo the game and relax, im pretty sure most people play a game to get away from real life issues, not have them simulated in the game world.I’ve experienced first-hand how damaging this can be to relationships with guild members, I wouldn’t be surprised if there is some major guild drama in other guilds caused by this content. It is not enjoyable.

Why is the happening? Because there’s long-term consequences caused by this content, we do not know how major or minor that will be yet, but it still means that there will be a permanant change to the game depending on how people vote. Naturally, it isn’t surprising that people will fight about it if someone else isn’t voting for how they want to see the game world evolve.

Before anyone brings up the political system in TERA, that is not the same thing, as it does not affect the story of that game, it is not run by an npc. Also, guild leaders in TERA pretty much always had to have low taxes etc or else they would never be voted in again, and re-elections happened on roughly a monthly basis, it was not a system that promoted the sort of vitriolic attitude in the playerbase as Cutthroat Politics has.

TL;DR: Putting Politics (and politicial process) in a game with permanent and long-term effects on the game’s storyline turns a community sour and venomous towards each other. please leave this stuff in the real world, I play GW2 to have fun, not have politics and other touchy subjects slapping me in the face every 5 minutes.

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: Tom Gore.4035

Tom Gore.4035

I think you are taking this election a bit too seriously…

One – Piken Square

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: Wolfheart.1938

Wolfheart.1938

If anybody turns sour or venomous against other player because of their favourite candidate I think they should see a good doctor.

“We have no first-person view because stupid people would lock into it”
“You can’t have more than 10 HS decks because that would confuse people”
“30 fps is more cinematic”

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: Vol.5241

Vol.5241

I disagree. I think politics is a good idea and interesting.

[Permabanned on Forums]
[Currently Inactive, Playing BF4]
Magic find works. http://sinasdf.imgur.com/

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: Erasculio.2914

Erasculio.2914

TL;DR: Putting Politics (and politicial process) in a game with permanent and long-term effects on the game’s storyline turns a community sour and venomous towards each other. please leave this stuff in the real world, I play GW2 to have fun, not have politics and other touchy subjects slapping me in the face every 5 minutes.

Uh… The community has always been sour and venomous towards each other. Just take a look at the WvW forum to see people fighting for being in different words, see discussions about balance with people claiming that the profession of the last guy who beat them is overpowered, the discussions between former GW1 players and former WoW players, and so on.

Yesterday I was in Orr and I saw that Arah was up. When I went there to do the event, I saw people farming the Champion Giant, engaged in a verbal fight with a very angry guy who wanted to kill the giant to finish the event chain and unlock the dungeon. “Sour” and “venomous”? Right there.

“I think that players are starting to mature past the point of wanting to be on that
treadmill, of being in that obvious pattern of every time I catch up you are going to
put another carrot in front of me” – Mike O’Brien right before Ascended weapons

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: Nightarch.2943

Nightarch.2943

If anybody turns sour or venomous against other player because of their favourite candidate I think they should see a good doctor.

The Doctor is in!

Attachments:

Guild Wars 2 is not a sequel to the original Guild Wars but merely an alternative story setting.

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: Lurch.9517

Lurch.9517

Its an achievement point farm, I am sure 90% of people who do it are not looking at it any further than this.

Lurch
Gandara

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: cesmode.4257

cesmode.4257

I agree, taking it too seriously. For now, I kind of like how politics are being handled in this game. More bribary and back-alley incentives would be cool.

Tera had politics but you elected players. Interesting as an idea, but then they became the cool kids in school, once elected.

I like this much better. Elect one, there are pros and cons to each, unique content being offered to each..

Karma is as abundant as air, and as useless as the Kardashians.

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: Curae.1837

Curae.1837

The following conversation (roughly, can’t remember exact words) was held in my guild last evening:
a: Hea, who do you support?
b: Both, I just want to get my achievements done, I don’t really care.
c: Oh I support Evon, the fractal seems cooler. But I don’t really mind if Kiel would win.
d: I just want a charr mini, I don’t really care for the kiel one. Might or mightn’t do the achievements.
e: They’re all achievement points and I just want to get to the next reward chest!

Actually; no one really cared, we ran fractals twice last night so everyone would get the achievements for both. shrug

There might be some people who really care about it, but there will always be people like that. It’s a game, where everyone will get multiple votes, and tbh; there might be ‘some’ impact in the game; Kiel would do x where evon will do y; but I highly doubt it’ll be a matter of what is going to happen. They are most likely not the driving force behind events happening although they may play a role in it.
With not being a driving force I mean that it are usually enemy forces who ignite stuff into events.

“When we remember that we are all mad.
The mysteries dissapear and life stands explained.”

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: bri.2359

bri.2359

@OP

I suggest you close the chat window and just play the game, at least until this event is over …

Lvl 80’s: Ranger; Guardian; Mesmer; Necromancer; Thief
Gandara Megaserver

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: LanfearShadowflame.3189

LanfearShadowflame.3189

If anybody turns sour or venomous against other player because of their favourite candidate I think they should see a good doctor.

The Doctor is in!

ROFL! <3

@OP

I think you may need to take a deep breath, step back, and calm down a little. This is a game, its a fun poke at real life.

While the forum community can get venomous at times, I’ve found that the actual in game community is much more laid back and enjoyable. There will be a few rotten apples/spoil sports, but that really isn’t different than any other content or event. There will always be a few PITAs, but for the most part, people will generally just have fun with it. I think you’re stressing out over something relatively minor.

Don’t look at me like that. Whatever you’ve heard, it’s probably not true.

I think politics in-game is a bad idea.

in Cutthroat Politics

Posted by: The Zed.7129

The Zed.7129

@OP. I don’t know if your seeing something I’m not or finding malice where none was intended. I’ve found the vast majority of the “political debate” among the players to be either a) light hearted or b) centered sole on which fractal they would prefer.

Edit: As for me, I’m going Kiel. I’d rather see a fractal about an event recent to GW2 lore then one long ago even in GW1 history.