Inquest Golems stronger too?
The bug was causing players (and structures) to take exponentially more damage from golems.
A hotfix last week fixed the problem with gates, but the fix for players was slated to come in with Monday’s patch. Is it still in the game then?
Is this bug really still in the game? Arenanet had a lot of bugs slated to be fixed yesterday, and I figured the golem bug would be a priority along with the experience bug.
That would be pretty troubling if this bug is still happening.
Is this bug really still in the game? Arenanet had a lot of bugs slated to be fixed yesterday, and I figured the golem bug would be a priority along with the experience bug.
That would be pretty troubling if this bug is still happening.
Hey! Remember that one time when Mesmers had 40ish bugs for almost a year and every “fix” left them worse off!?! Don’t be ‘troubled at getting smoke blown up your kitten. “Working as (un)intended.” Just roll an Asura Longbow Ranger in the meantime and enjoy the 75k bursts on a 15 sec cooldown. As long as FGS got put in its place, all the OP ’exploits’ seem to be obsolete right?
#AnetPlzHireMeForCheap b/c your balance and QA teams are clearly overworked and/or doing heavy drugs.
#AnetPlzHireMeForCheap b/c your balance and QA teams are clearly overworked and/or doing heavy drugs.
The latter theory would go a long way to explaining how the 9/9 patch got released in the state it was in.
I ran a store at one point with between 40 and 50 employees. I had five guys that were amazing. I mean really really awesome. I had another 10 that were good. There was simply no way to find another 30ish people who were as good as the main guys.
The Pareto Principle. That’s pretty much true in everything, though, not just in business. The same is true in science where the greatest breakthroughs can often come from a select few geniuses without the help of and often even in spite of their colleagues.
It’s actually quite common to have a few people pulling most of the weight. That happened at one of my previous places of employment. You’d have eight people on the floor, but only three of them would be doing any of the work. The other five would goof off unless you had someone to babysit them. But, there rarely was anyone to babysit them because many of the shiftleaders and even managers also didn’t do very much. So, unless you were lucky enough to be scheduled with a shift leader who made sure everything ran smoothly, or there was a manager there who would actually address any serious issues rather than pretend to be busy, you basically had the majority of the workforce doing little or nothing.
Some of the managers were even worse than the shift leaders, because they would literally do nothing when they were out on the floor. They basically just looked important and got upset with you for not being able to keep up with the workload, even if everyone else was goofing off and you were the only one trying to get anything done. So, some of the managers never really did or helped anything unless they were doing management work in the office or there was an issue that needed a manager’s attention (and even then, most issues were the result of work not being done by the employees who would goof off if nobody watched them)
It’s pretty common for a small number of people to be holding everything together. At that place, it was basically two managers, one shift leader, and three or four people on the floor who kept everything running on a daily basis. I don’t know about how efficiently things ran off the floor, as I never worked in the other departments.
At one employee meeting we even came up with an idea to elect one of our most competent coworkers as an unofficial floor leader who could give an overall direction for what the team should be doing at any given time. I thought this was a good idea, since that’s what the shift leaders were supposed to be doing but they rarely ever did. The management didn’t think it would ever work.
I ran a store at one point with between 40 and 50 employees. I had five guys that were amazing. I mean really really awesome. I had another 10 that were good. There was simply no way to find another 30ish people who were as good as the main guys.
The Pareto Principle. That’s pretty much true in everything, though, not just in business. The same is true in science where the greatest breakthroughs can often come from a select few geniuses without the help of and often even in spite of their colleagues.
It’s actually quite common to have a few people pulling most of the weight. That happened at one of my previous places of employment. You’d have eight people on the floor, but only three of them would be doing any of the work. The other five would goof off unless you had someone to babysit them. But, there rarely was anyone to babysit them because many of the shiftleaders and even managers also didn’t do very much. So, unless you were lucky enough to be scheduled with a shift leader who made sure everything ran smoothly, or there was a manager there who would actually address any serious issues rather than pretend to be busy, you basically had the majority of the workforce doing little or nothing.
Some of the managers were even worse than the shift leaders, because they would literally do nothing when they were out on the floor. They basically just looked important and got upset with you for not being able to keep up with the workload, even if everyone else was goofing off and you were the only one trying to get anything done. So, some of the managers never really did or helped anything unless they were doing management work in the office or there was an issue that needed a manager’s attention (and even then, most issues were the result of work not being done by the employees who would goof off if nobody watched them)
It’s pretty common for a small number of people to be holding everything together. At that place, it was basically two managers, one shift leader, and three or four people on the floor who kept everything running on a daily basis. I don’t know about how efficiently things ran off the floor, as I never worked in the other departments.
At one employee meeting we even came up with an idea to elect one of our most competent coworkers as an unofficial floor leader who could give an overall direction for what the team should be doing at any given time. I thought this was a good idea, since that’s what the shift leaders were supposed to be doing but they rarely ever did. The management didn’t think it would ever work.
Sorry deleted my post. I just can’t afford more infractions, and I’m at the point where I just don’t know if something I type relatively innocently will be taken wrong.
Wait, YOU get infractions, Vayne? O.o
Wait, YOU get infractions, Vayne? O.o
You have no idea. Sometimes I think my middle name is infraction.
On topic: has anyone tested this after today’s patch? Is this still a bug? Anyone?