One more thing about classes PvE/PvP

One more thing about classes PvE/PvP

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Firelysm.4967

Firelysm.4967

Many say rangers are bad in PvP/PvE, i just meet a guy in WvW who said rangers suck.
“warrior has this, guard that, necro that.. he started”.. and i stopped for a second.. and think about it?! It’s not that rangers are bad, other classes have to many things.

Wish I could get back to GW1.. PvP-GvG. It feels like we are outcasted, not desired or rewarded..

One more thing about classes PvE/PvP

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Xenon.4537

Xenon.4537

Rangers are actually not that bad. It’s the demographic that plays rangers that’s bad. Generally the type of player that is attracted to pet classes is casual and carefree. They don’t like to min-max, they want to play at their own pace, they want their pet to tank for them so they can lazily shoot from afar while playing Candy Crush on their smart phone. Its the same reason Hunters got the nick name “Huntard” in WoW. The class itself promotes some bad habits and draws bad players to it. But again, some rare few rangers who actually apply themselves are pretty good. There’s just a negative stigma in the community due to the bad apples.

One more thing about classes PvE/PvP

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Vukorep.3081

Vukorep.3081

Yes some classes have more things to offer for ‘supporting’ players around them. More ways to ineract with them. More utilities.

but that doesnt mean rangers dont have anything to offer.
Specialy when it comes to dps