Reconsider servers popolation EU

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Billaboong.6821

Billaboong.6821

There are three world sizes

1) Medium: transferring cost 500 Gem.
2) High: transferring cost 1000 Gem
3) Very High: transferring cost 1800 Gem

for a total of 27 servers. The fact is, more and more people have started playing since the launch and worlds are becoming more crowded, here’s a list with the population stats right now

7% Medium: Vabbi; Arborstone
44% High: Far Shiverpeaks; Kodash; Augury Rock; Fissure of Woe; Whiteside Ridge; Gunnar’s Hold; Dzagonour; Abbadon’s Mouth; Miller’s SOund; Fort Ranik; Ruins of Surmia; Piken Square
49% Very High: Ring of Fire; Riverside; Blacktide; Baruch Bay; Vizunah Square; Jade Sea; Elona Reach; Underworld; Gandara; Drakkar Lake; Aurora Glade; DEsolation; Seafarer’s Rest

As you can see, there are only two medium world remaining, and since the game’s popolation is increasing day by day they will disappear.
EDIT:What I suggest is redisign the gauge determining the server popolation and rebalance it to 33%;33%;33%

What I suggest is take down all servers of one category, wich means all very high server become high, high becomes medium and the two medium stay medium

(edited by Billaboong.6821)

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Inculpatus cedo.9234

Inculpatus cedo.9234

What if the population doesn’t reflect an even 33% across the board? Who gets to pay less to be on what is, in reality, a higher population server? Who has to pay more to be on what is, in reality, a lower population server?

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: GrandmaFunk.3052

GrandmaFunk.3052

What I suggest is redisign the gauge determining the server popolation and rebalance it to 33%;33%;33%

Then you and a large portion of the players on your server should get forcefully migrated to Vabbi or Arborstone. Do you really want that? split you off from your community, friends and guildmates?

GamersWithJobs [GWJ]
Northern Shiverpeaks

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Louveepine.7630

Louveepine.7630

Jade Sea more than 50% of RP players.

If you are separated, it will be bad.

# Asura because I’m worth it!

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Billaboong.6821

Billaboong.6821

Sorry, I expressed myself badly, edited the post!

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Inculpatus cedo.9234

Inculpatus cedo.9234

Lol. Why don’t you just ask them to change the cost of transferring, instead of such a convoluted scheme?

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Billaboong.6821

Billaboong.6821

Lol. Why don’t you just ask them to change the cost of transferring, instead of such a convoluted scheme?

it’s not about the transferring cost, it’s nonsense to have 2 medium servers only

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: Inculpatus cedo.9234

Inculpatus cedo.9234

Why?

Some time ago, they changed the terms used to designate the populations, adding in Very High. Are you asking them to change the terms back to Full, High, Medium and Low? Why must there be an equal amount of named servers? If some have more population than others, should they not reflect that? If two or one or six or whatever number has less or more, should those inhabiting those servers be moved against their will to make sure all designations are equal? If it isn’t about the cost, what difference does it make, as far as designations go?

(edited by Inculpatus cedo.9234)

Reconsider servers popolation EU

in Guild Wars 2 Discussion

Posted by: DarkMonk.4531

DarkMonk.4531

it’s nonsense to have 2 medium servers only

It is nonsense to call server Highly Populated when it has dead acounts as 50% of population