Requst: Sell back or DE Gem Store Purchases
I had two silver feds and the same thing happened to me. Support gave me a refund for one of them
Mesmers be like: I reject your reality and substitute my own. – compliments to Mythbusters
Plot Twist: Elder Dragons are massive robots created by the Black Lion Trading Company.
Think of the money they make off weapons and armor…
Plot Twist: Elder Dragons are massive robots created by the Black Lion Trading Company.
Think of the money they make off weapons and armor…
What precedence? The gathering tools going from soulbound to account bound were different if that’s what you were thinking.
Yes! Let me salvage my now useless Salvage-O-Matics for gems.
Make it work with any item, you only get back half of what you paid.
What precedence? The gathering tools going from soulbound to account bound were different if that’s what you were thinking.
The precedence I cited! It was right there, you just had to keep reading the sentence! I can sell back gold for fewer gems than I bought it with.
What precedence? The gathering tools going from soulbound to account bound were different if that’s what you were thinking.
The precedence I cited! It was right there, you just had to keep reading the sentence! I can sell back gold for fewer gems than I bought it with.
That’s not a precedence…
Actually, do you mean precedence or precedents?
(edited by Ayrilana.1396)
The CS Team already addressed this issue. If the purchase was within a reasonable time of the change, a player could get a refund. Otherwise, the item had use for Gems spent.
Yes! Let me salvage my now useless Salvage-O-Matics for gems.
Careful what you ask for… a Salvage-o-matic salvaging itself = Salvage Inception O_o
The CS Team already addressed this issue. If the purchase was within a reasonable time of the change, a player could get a refund. Otherwise, the item had use for Gems spent.
If they consider “after changing the game to make multi copper-feds obsolete” then that rule would apply. But I doubt they are considering it from that vantage points.
The CS Team already addressed this issue. If the purchase was within a reasonable time of the change, a player could get a refund. Otherwise, the item had use for Gems spent.
If they consider “after changing the game to make multi copper-feds obsolete” then that rule would apply. But I doubt they are considering it from that vantage points.
That’s exactly when they responded to the issue. When players wanted their obsolete Salvage-O-Matics, and other items refunded because of Shared Inventory Slots.
The CS Team already addressed this issue. If the purchase was within a reasonable time of the change, a player could get a refund. Otherwise, the item had use for Gems spent.
If they consider “after changing the game to make multi copper-feds obsolete” then that rule would apply. But I doubt they are considering it from that vantage points.
That’s exactly when they responded to the issue. When players wanted their obsolete Salvage-O-Matics, and other items refunded because of Shared Inventory Slots.
Which is it? a “reasonable time before the change” or anything purchased before the change?
The CS Team already addressed this issue. If the purchase was within a reasonable time of the change, a player could get a refund. Otherwise, the item had use for Gems spent.
If they consider “after changing the game to make multi copper-feds obsolete” then that rule would apply. But I doubt they are considering it from that vantage points.
Put in your support ticket and find out. It costs you nothing except a little time.
That’s exactly when they responded to the issue. When players wanted their obsolete Salvage-O-Matics, and other items refunded because of Shared Inventory Slots.Which is it? a “reasonable time before the change” or anything purchased before the change?
Put in your support ticket to find out. It only costs you a little of your time.
John Smith: “you should kill monsters, because killing monsters is awesome.”
(edited by Illconceived Was Na.9781)