Guild Wars 2

I have two options, I pick hunter or warrior. Which one is more viable now? I like both equally and its worth to note I occassionally play PvP but mostly do PvE and sometimes WvW. Thanks for any input!

Warrior if you don’t like to put much effort. You will bored within a week of playing because of how simple it is but the class is viable everywhere, ranger if you like to deal with poor AI pathing and delays but class is still viable, just be prepared to be kittened. Pick your poison.

Ranger is probably my favorite profession right now. The profession has some big issues, but still great fun to play.
Warrior was my first 80 and my most played. I like playing it, just feels a little more faceroll than the others.
I would highly recommend playing a ranger.

I’d say warrior. In PvE all you do as a ranger is use two of your longbow skills and then autoattack with your sword until something dies. So it’s pretty much boring and braindead gameplay where you just dodge every now and then and part from that just keep autoattacking. With warrior you are at least doing damage rotations all the time since you have low cooldowns on you skills and on weapon swap.

Apart from that, as you may know, the pet is useless. It’s there only to take like a third of your dps and die, making you completely useless, since at that moment you’re doing no damage, you’re squishy, sad, pathetic, depressed and so on

Seriously though, warrior is definetly a better choice for PvE. Ranger is pretty fun in sPvP but that’s about it. It has almost no distinctive mechanics, to the point where it feels generic and boring as hell after a while. The only “difficulty” is that you have to dodge incoming damage more so then a warrior, while, as i said, warrior is much more fun when you actually get into combat and start slashing stuff.
So warrior for PvE and propably WvW as well, while ranger can be fun in sPvP, since you can use a condition build and not be terribly useless as you would be in PvE…

Both are fine if played right.