221 hours over 1,581 days of bank space/hot pve/lion’s arch afk and some wvw.
disappointed with the 100 cap on laurels
221 hours over 1,581 days of bank space/hot pve/lion’s arch afk and some wvw.
Are you sure about this? People have given completely contradicting accounts.
Has this been confirmed? I’ve heard of multiple people getting over 100 laurels in the other thread…
Have laurels really been out that long? Or is it possible to get more than 1 laurel per day?
People who got the double monthly last month can have 100 laurels atm.
Jade Quarry – Team Savvy – #1 NA WvW Solo Guild
could we have an official reply on this please?
and hopefully this is a mistake.
there should not be a cap on laurels, ever.
The OP is referring to this thread:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/gw2/Warning-100-Laurel-Cap
The moderator closed the thread, but in the end we were still unsure of the answer.
To quote Healix.5819, the issue which still remains is:
“It may be possible that there both is and isn’t a cap at 100. For example, if it’s a simple check to only reward laurels if you have less than 100, then the monthly could bypass it, allowing you to gain 99+10 laurels maximum.
To confirm a cap or not, someone with 100+ laurels would have to complete a daily.”
The OP is referring to this thread:
https://forum-en.gw2archive.eu/forum/game/gw2/Warning-100-Laurel-CapThe moderator closed the thread, but in the end we were still unsure of the answer.
To quote Healix.5819, the issue which still remains is:
“It may be possible that there both is and isn’t a cap at 100. For example, if it’s a simple check to only reward laurels if you have less than 100, then the monthly could bypass it, allowing you to gain 99+10 laurels maximum.
To confirm a cap or not, someone with 100+ laurels would have to complete a daily.”
Given ANet’s past history, I think it’s safe to say that going over 100 Laurels is a bug, and will be considered an exploit. Everyone that stays over 100 Laurels will be banned.
And no, I am NOT joking. When the default maximum for counters of most things is 250, I don’t think the 100 limit would ever come up unless someone had gone out of their way to try to write it in there. It will be confirmed as an exploit when the mods lock or delete this thread as well, maybe after scattering around a nice pile of infractions.
delicate, brick-like subtlety.
ONE person claimed he was capped at 100, several people responded that they had over 100 currently or in the past. Nothing was confirmed by anyone from Anet but I find the word of several people who claim they personally have not been limited to 100 laurels to be more believable than one person who posted a message and then never came back to respond to their posts.
Post something controversial, pretend it’s the Truth, and sit back and watch people argue about it. Seems to me there’s a name for this kind of behavior…
…
Given ANet’s past history, I think it’s safe to say that going over 100 Laurels is a bug, and will be considered an exploit. Everyone that stays over 100 Laurels will be banned.
…
ehm…
1) this is no real exploit because it’s not repeatable
2) not every player knew you get another 10 laurels (for example they guy who made the first topic about it because he was surprised by it – would just be super unfair to ban him and others who just didnt knew this and couldnt have known that it was unintended)
26x lvl 80 Characters
Most fabulous Character: http://i.imgur.com/5JtcBI1.jpg?1
…
Given ANet’s past history, I think it’s safe to say that going over 100 Laurels is a bug, and will be considered an exploit. Everyone that stays over 100 Laurels will be banned.
…ehm…
1) this is no real exploit because it’s not repeatable
2) not every player knew you get another 10 laurels (for example they guy who made the first topic about it because he was surprised by it – would just be super unfair to ban him and others who just didnt knew this and couldnt have known that it was unintended)
Sarcasm eludes you.
yeah.. really.. if anet think that you are not suppose to have 100 laurels yet, and yet you do, prepare for ban hammer. you are exploiting !
Archeage = Farmville with PK
No cap at 100, see pic. I’ve been saving my laurels with no intention on spending them anytime soon. I doubt they would ban for passing the supposed 100L limit that’s been rumored. But then again, no way for us to know what ANet is really up to.
@ReMortis: Did you get that 103 Laurels from having 93 Laurels and then completing the Monthly? We have several confirmed statements from people that managed to exceed the so-called “cap” by this method. What we are trying to determine now is what happens if somebody with more than 100 Laurels completes a Daily. Does the count still go up? Or does it stall?
I got my monthly a few days ago and have been doing the daily ones everyday since then, and the counter still goes up. Did it just yesterday and went from 102 to 103, no problem. I assume the same thing will happen when I do my daily today as I reach 104.
edit: and as far as I recall, hitting my monthly put me near but not at or above 100, and the daily ones got me to where I am from there. Can’t be 100% about this though.
(edited by ReMortis.4287)
I logged on today with 100 laurels, did my daily, and got one more. Currently at 101.
Alright, so it looks like the report of Laurels being capped at 100 is false then.
Panic for the sake of panic.
-Every forum ever
“A release is 7 days or less away or has just happened within the last 7 days…
These are the only two states you’ll find the world of Tyria.”
On the bright side, it’s good to know that it’s still so easy to troll the forums…
On the bright side, it’s good to know that it’s still so easy to troll the forums…
Yeah, i think thats what the Moderator meant by “the matter is resolved”.
There is no cap, I thought it was very clear from the other topic.
Move on people, nothing to see here.
Having over 9000 laurels won’t get you banned.
Delayed content is eventually good. Rushed content is eternally bad. ~ Shigeru Miyamoto
Sarcasm eludes you.
To be fair, I may have done that a bit too straight for it to come off as sarcasm.
However, it wouldn’t surprise me if there IS a bug that might hit some people.
delicate, brick-like subtlety.
Head of Global Community
There is no cap at 100 (or anywhere close).