have you ever noticed?
i agree with the Charr running issue whole heartedly. I have been trying to create Charr characters with many classes and engineer is the only one i am can keep. Yes because of weapon kit i can kept him running with 2 legs.
Just reading about Lord Farren being so scantily clad this Wintersday …
I really don’t want to see more skin from any of my characters …
Who would want to see a heavyset Norn strutting around exposing his chankles?
Well, don’t quote me on this, but I have heard it rumoured that lady-people occasionally indulge in a little GW2
<—- lady-person
Rational armour?
Okay, well, rationally speaking, we’re fighting giants, dragons, monsters, magic-wielders, gunslingers, and other manners of beings. Rationally speaking, any suit of armour you could realistically wear would be entirely useless against a giant or a dragon that’s the size of a house. Medieval armour didn’t even entirely protect them from real weapons like a mace. A giant wielding a tree is not going to be concerned with whether you’re wearing a sheet of metal, a skinned cow, or a skinned sheep. A magic-caster dropping ice chunks the size of boulders will give no craps either.
Therefore, rationally, metal armour is pointless, as one’s best defense is a good offense and good mobility, which a big chunk of heavy metal hinders, rather than aids.
The obvious conclusion, rationally, is that the best armour would be that which gives you greatest mobility, is unlikely to get caught on things (or itself), cannot be tripped over, and won’t get in your way or block your vision. In other words, the rationally best armour would be… skimpy. You won’t trip over a pair of shorts or a bikini, like you would a robe. A pair of briefs won’t restrict your movement, like a suit of heavy metal would. A bikini top or tank top wouldn’t get caught on itself, like a trenchcoat heavy on buckles may.
Rationally speaking, Faren is more appropriately attired for active, evasive combat in his undies than your warrior running around in full plate.