weapon size
I think it scales with height, some armors however scale with body type.
IMO it should be better if weapons have a stable size.
Its only natural for a Norn to use human swords like they were knives, and for an Asura to look tiny in comparison with his human greatsword…
At least projectiles should have a fixed aspect. Currently, flamethrowers on Asura and Charr are deceiving in their range because of this. Not nice at all.
“Only problem with the Engineer is
that it makes every other class in the game boring to play.”
Hawks
that it makes every other class in the game boring to play.”
Hawks
While I never expected my asuran to carry a sword exactly as big as the biggest Norn, I didn’t expect it scaled down to the point most of the detail was lost.
So disappointing to see an awesome GS wielding warrior, think, an asuran would look awesome rocking that monster!
And then it looks like a toothpick.
“The short answer is that new content is not going to drive people away from the game.
There is absolutely no evidence to support that it would.” -AnthonyOrdon
There is absolutely no evidence to support that it would.” -AnthonyOrdon
I think ill go with the tallest norn guardian with the stongest physique
kinda always liked guardian more than the warrior and its blue skills match the norm ratial skills.
i also kinda disliked the dragon hunter theme but with a norn it does make more sense than a dh sylvari.
as for charrs i wanted to play a warrior but the ratial skills are more leaning towards engies.
IMO it should be better if weapons have a stable size.
Its only natural for a Norn to use human swords like they were knives, and for an Asura to look tiny in comparison with his human greatsword…
At least projectiles should have a fixed aspect. Currently, flamethrowers on Asura and Charr are deceiving in their range because of this. Not nice at all.
um… so you want an asura to be holding an eternity that’s literally about 3x the size of it?