Honoring Eir

Honoring Eir

in Living World

Posted by: Ithilwen.1529

Ithilwen.1529

I’ve just come from Eir’s memorial in Hoelbrak. Tears still drying. Well done ANET.

Mesmerising Girl

Honoring Eir

in Living World

Posted by: Ithilwen.1529

Ithilwen.1529

-edit- Small logical error in the story. The Skald states that Knut Whitebear banished Eir from Hoelbrak. She goes on to say that Eir returned to Hoelbrack with Destiny’s Edge before defeating the Lieutenant of Jormag.

She could not have done this if she were banished.

Mesmerising Girl

Honoring Eir

in Living World

Posted by: anninke.7469

anninke.7469

-edit- Small logical error in the story. The Skald states that Knut Whitebear banished Eir from Hoelbrak. She goes on to say that Eir returned to Hoelbrack with Destiny’s Edge before defeating the Lieutenant of Jormag.

She could not have done this if she were banished.

Well, they were passing through Hoelbrak on their way.

Honoring Eir

in Living World

Posted by: Menadena.7482

Menadena.7482

I wish it could have been optional or something though. I know at least one person that was triggered by it.

Honoring Eir

in Living World

Posted by: Vayne.8563

Vayne.8563

-edit- Small logical error in the story. The Skald states that Knut Whitebear banished Eir from Hoelbrak. She goes on to say that Eir returned to Hoelbrack with Destiny’s Edge before defeating the Lieutenant of Jormag.

She could not have done this if she were banished.

But that’s what happened. She wasn’t banned because she commited a crime per se. This was Knut’s way of motivating her to get the job done.

The second time she returned, she returned with a team and a plan. So she did actually return to Hoelbrak after being banished.

Honoring Eir

in Living World

Posted by: ProtoGunner.4953

ProtoGunner.4953

It bored the crap out of me. I just can’t connect with those Disney characters. I don’t hate them nonetheless, but compared to – let’s say – a Bioware character, it falls extremely short.

‘would have/would’ve been’ —> correct
‘would of been’ —> wrong