Defending Scarlet's Legacy

Defending Scarlet's Legacy

in Lore

Posted by: Stephen.6312

Stephen.6312

Reflections On Scarlet

Quintessential Sylvari Female
Scarlet has been labeled a “lore breaker” but in at least one way she is quintessential Sylvari. She joins the ranks of the Pale Tree, Caithe and Faolin as an influential Sylvari female. Of course, Caithe and Faolin are the only female Sylvari firstborn (that we know of) and so their influence is almost assured. Just as importantly, each has played a major part in the development of Sylvari society. Both Caithe and Faolin contributed to the formation of the Nightmare Court (Caithe spurred Caedryn on to form the Court and Faolin, of course, was the first to turn to Nightmare) and Caithe was also instrumental in the reconciliation of the member’s of Destiny’s Edge (with a little help from the player-character). In a sense, Scarlet mirrors both Sylvari: Caithe in that she is able to unite parties traditionally known for their estrangement; Faolin in that she has rejected the Dream and chosen a path similar in many respects to the Nightmare. Who but a Sylvari could unite parties as effectively? So many other potential mediators are hampered by the history of their races. On a side note, Scarlet’s quest has led to the burgeoning of knowledge within the Dream Of Dreams – anything she has learned is now available for all Sylvari.

What Scarlet Saw
This short story purports to tell us about what Scarlet saw when she gazed into the Eternal Alchemy. But we read very little of the Eternal Alchemy – instead the story is dominated by an exchange between the Pale Tree and Scarlet. This may be important, as it suggests one of two things: 1) The Pale Tree can gaze into the Eternal Alchemy or 2) she was closely monitoring Scarlet. Although the first option is a possibility, it is more likely that the second option is correct: The Pale Tree was monitoring Scarlet. If this is the case, it suggests that Scarlet is destined to play an important role in the development of Sylvari society, with similar effects to those of Faolin and Caedryn. Again, the Pale Tree’s intervention seems to be unique – we have no other record of a direct address by the Pale Tree to one of her children without the aid of her avatar (i.e. that is not delivered in person); and again, this highlights just how unique Scarlet is and just how aware the Pale Tree is of this.
As much as the Pale Tree may have intervened in the course of Scarlet’s peering, we can probably safely assume that whatever Scarlet saw the Pale Tree also saw. This may be worthy of note, as the Pale Tree has taken little or no action against Scarlet, suggesting that whatever Scarlet thought she saw was not what she actually did see. However, given that Scarlet’s experiences have now entered the Dream Of Dreams it has introduced new dynamics that could lead to a repeat of her mistakes. Essentially, there will be more “Scarlets” to come as a result. Moreover, a part of the Eternal Alchemy may now have “spilled into” the Dream Of Dreams. It is unclear whether the Asura can actually peer into it themselves and so what little Scarlet may have seen could be of great value to them.

Defending Scarlet's Legacy

in Lore

Posted by: draxynnic.3719

draxynnic.3719

Caithe and Faolain are not the only known female Firstborn. It took me all of about ten seconds to find the list of Firstborn on the wiki, which as well as those two include Aife and Niamh (the luminaries of Dawn and Noon respectively). With nine firstborn known, five are male and four female – within statistical expectations, and with room for the remaining three to balance the numbers perfectly.

I’m also pretty certain that Scarlet is not in fact unique with receiving a special visitation from the Pale Tree, but even if she was, the circumstances probably have more to do with it than any specialness on her part – she was in what has been described in an interview as effectively a sensory deprivation tank which, depending on your interpretation, either made her particularly sensitive to signals that most would not be able to receive due to outside distractions (such as the Eternal Alchemy and direct long-distance communications from the Pale Tree)… or caused her to hallucinate the whole thing.

It was, I believe, mentioned in the story that she was supposed to have some special purpose, but she went off the rails in both senses of the metaphor.

To those who think Scarlet hate means she’s succeeded as a villain:
People don’t hate Scarlet like Game of Thrones fans hate Joffrey.
They hate her the way Star Wars fans hate Jar Jar Binks.

Defending Scarlet's Legacy

in Lore

Posted by: Stooperdale.3560

Stooperdale.3560

I think you are reading too much into Scarlet’s conversation with the Pale Tree in “What Scarlet saw”. Firstly, Scarlet may not have talked to the actual Pale Tree in same way that I would not talk to the real Marilyn Monroe if I dreamed about her. Secondly, if Scarlet’s vision was connected to the mists then it possible she saw a representation of the Pale Tree rather than the real thing. Thirdly, the Pale Tree may have some empathic communication with the Sylvari through the dream of dreams whenever they are in a dream-like state, regardless of asura magi-tech experiments.

We haven’t been told yet what the Pale Tree knows about Caera/Scarlet. That’s a big missing piece of the jigsaw.

(edited by Stooperdale.3560)

Defending Scarlet's Legacy

in Lore

Posted by: Mystic Starfish.2586

Mystic Starfish.2586

I always assumed Scarlet became like the Soundless, choosing to cut themselves off from the Dream. It doesn’t make sense for her to continue that connection with the Tree and all the other Sylvari if her main goal is to destroy that connection and the predetermination that it insinuates.

Defending Scarlet's Legacy

in Lore

Posted by: Stephen.6312

Stephen.6312

Hey draxynnic,
I can see that I was wrong about how may Sylvari female firstborn there are. A bit silly of me to overlook such an obvious error. kitten.