Would killing the dragons be a negative?

Would killing the dragons be a negative?

in Lore

Posted by: RedSpectrum.1975

RedSpectrum.1975

On the surface, the Elder Dragons are regarded as evil, destructive. I mean, some of their methods can be catastrophic. But let’s not forget, the Elder Dragons are a natural part of Tyria. Their “ecological niche” seems to be to balance the amount of magic in the environment. Once the magic is at a high, they awaken, consume it, and then slumber as it leaks out of their bodies in wait for the cycle to begin again. Here are the exact words in the interview posted a few days ago in another thread. My question is, I don’t think most of Tyria realizes this (correct me if I’m wrong by all means). I completely understand their wanting to rid the world of the dragons, let’s be honest, they do their job in a cataclysmic fashion. However, when something of importance is taken from its natural environment, that usually results in negative consequences. Ultimately, if all of the Elder Dragons were slain, what would happen if the magic built too high? Are the Elder Dragons absolutely essential for the planet’s natural order? Would there be worse problems if they were gone? Is lobster better than crab legs?

Shawtell, Zen Verani, Rayshia Howen, Iyado, Colace Nzoir, Arteel Fyrien [Teef]

Would killing the dragons be a negative?

in Lore

Posted by: Konig Des Todes.2086

Konig Des Todes.2086

Rather old interview by now and most frequenters have already discussed this in length. To sum it up, there’s really two issues with Angel’s wording. She says it’s their “natural role” but… how so?

There’s no indication that magic would rise with them dead – after all, it’s stated that magic rises as the Elder Dragons hibernate because, as we learned even back in GW1, they radiate magic while asleep. If their corpses function like Glint’s, then even their dead bodies will.

So the questions become:

  1. What happens when magic g ets really high? There’s no indication that magic, on its own, in high concentrations is a bad thing. Though, maybe it is.
  2. Does the magic of the world increase even without the Elder Dragons? If it doesn’t, then the Elder Dragons’ death just means that magic stabilizes.

And back to the “natural role” bit – is it like they’re part of the world itself, born with it? Or is it no different than saying a wolf’s natural role is to be a carnivore (so that’d make the Elder Dragons what, magivores?).

The sad thing is, we have no real indication to say what happens if magic builds up too high, thus no indication of what would happen to the world if they’re killed off. Magic is said to be finite resource, so presuming it doesn’t rise in quantity in the world without the Elder Dragons’ hibernation, then people using it would theoretically reduce it (but in a very slower state) until its gone. Though even with the ED awake, this should happen so it’s likely that magic, whether it’s stored within Elder Dragon or Bloodstone, is always constant in the world.

As to the last question: Lobsters taste better than crab legs, but crab legs give more meat per crab than lobster tail per lobster.

Dear ANet writers,
Stop treating GW2 as a single story. Each Season and expansion should be their own story.

Would killing the dragons be a negative?

in Lore

Posted by: RedSpectrum.1975

RedSpectrum.1975

Hm, yeah I’m sorry I’m no frequeter here but regardless that was a nice laid out explanation

Shawtell, Zen Verani, Rayshia Howen, Iyado, Colace Nzoir, Arteel Fyrien [Teef]

Would killing the dragons be a negative?

in Lore

Posted by: Erukk.1408

Erukk.1408

As Konig said, we don’t have enough details to make a clear prediction. But even then, we still have to probably kill them. It’s either us or them at this point.