Instead of 21 LW updates per year why not...

Instead of 21 LW updates per year why not...

in Living World

Posted by: Kalan.9705

Kalan.9705

Why not have Living Story on a 3 weekly update schedule, which is far less exhausting and gives many more people a chance to actually do the content.

The spare team this would free up could then do a wvw update with some actual real content in it every 2-4 months.

This seems like a better compromise as a lot of LS fans are questioning how fast the LS content appears and how much time it monopolises, and equally many wvw fans are very concerned that they got no real new content for the last year (underwhelming and rarely used seige-razer event & vertical ‘power not skill’ grind achievements = lame).

(edited by Kalan.9705)

Instead of 21 LW updates per year why not...

in Living World

Posted by: Vahkris.6847

Vahkris.6847

If they gave us the ability to play through historical Living World story content (sans returning content), pretty much all my current gripes about the frequency would disappear. They can put in 24 or even more updates each year, but if I can go back and play through previous stories if I stop playing for a month or two (due to real life situations like having a kid or being deployed), then have at it. Make the initial release live with special rewards, I don’t care, but someone can still experience the stories as they build on each other.

Heck, for rewards for completing this content they can just give us Black Lion scraps and add the older weapon sets that I barely ever see around. That’ll make it interesting.

(edited by Vahkris.6847)