gerdian
15 games, -2 points
So did some q’s today. Some were solo some were partial premade. All in all I probably won a little over half (or about half) of the games. Started the day with 58 points, finished with 56.
Honestly not sure what I’m suppose to do. Can I have a dev comment on this?
Pretty sure you can never get more than 1 score point for a win but you can lose up to 3 score from a single loss. This might help you understand.
So did some q’s today. Some were solo some were partial premade. All in all I probably won a little over half (or about half) of the games. Started the day with 58 points, finished with 56.
Honestly not sure what I’m suppose to do. Can I have a dev comment on this?
Pretty sure you can never get more than 1 score point for a win but you can lose up to 3 score from a single loss. This might help you understand.
What I’m trying to say is that its LTIERALLY impossible for me to get top top 500 rankings atm because even if I played non stop I apparently cant gain rank points anymore.
gerdian
So did some q’s today. Some were solo some were partial premade. All in all I probably won a little over half (or about half) of the games. Started the day with 58 points, finished with 56.
Honestly not sure what I’m suppose to do. Can I have a dev comment on this?
Pretty sure you can never get more than 1 score point for a win but you can lose up to 3 score from a single loss. This might help you understand.
What I’m trying to say is that its LTIERALLY impossible for me to get top top 500 rankings atm because even if I played non stop I apparently cant gain rank points anymore.
You basically need a 4:1 w/l ratio to advance with this system. You “winning a little over half” wont be enough to advance you due to said disparity between score gain and score loss.
So did some q’s today. Some were solo some were partial premade. All in all I probably won a little over half (or about half) of the games. Started the day with 58 points, finished with 56.
Honestly not sure what I’m suppose to do. Can I have a dev comment on this?
Pretty sure you can never get more than 1 score point for a win but you can lose up to 3 score from a single loss. This might help you understand.
What I’m trying to say is that its LTIERALLY impossible for me to get top top 500 rankings atm because even if I played non stop I apparently cant gain rank points anymore.
You basically need a 4:1 w/l ratio to advance with this system. You “winning a little over half” wont be enough to advance you due to said disparity between score gain and score loss.
The matchmaking is literally made to put bad players on my team so that I should lose 50% of the matches. If I need to win 80% of my games then that means anet is STILL catering to low MMR fools who farm games.
gerdian
Don’t worry, this still isn’t the full leaderboard system. Apparently what ever system they’re holding will be give to us later… according to one of the devs.
Why they haven’t done so already is beyond me… These two leaderboards have been a failure thus far. It’s hard to imagine that HoT would give us a leaderboard better than what we have seen. The only thing that’s improved has been the matchmaking algorithm.
If they haven’t discovered the issues half way through this test season then we’re never going to get a working leaderboard. It’s the only thing keeping most pvp players engaged. Without it, all we have are Tournaments but not everyone partakes in that.
Edited
Unless it’s participation they’re truly experimenting with here. They’ve extended the test season for 2 or 3 months, which is an absurd amount of time. Perhaps they’re seeing if more people really do want to grind out the leaderboard. After all, majority rules GW2.
aka FalseLights
Rank: Top 250 since Season 2
#5 best gerdien in wurld
Rank: Top 250 since Season 2
#5 best gerdien in wurld
(edited by Saiyan.1704)
So did some q’s today. Some were solo some were partial premade. All in all I probably won a little over half (or about half) of the games. Started the day with 58 points, finished with 56.
Honestly not sure what I’m suppose to do. Can I have a dev comment on this?
Pretty sure you can never get more than 1 score point for a win but you can lose up to 3 score from a single loss. This might help you understand.
What I’m trying to say is that its LTIERALLY impossible for me to get top top 500 rankings atm because even if I played non stop I apparently cant gain rank points anymore.
Why do you think you deserve to be at top500? It doesn’t depend on how much you play, but mostly depends on winrate
So did some q’s today. Some were solo some were partial premade. All in all I probably won a little over half (or about half) of the games. Started the day with 58 points, finished with 56.
Honestly not sure what I’m suppose to do. Can I have a dev comment on this?
Pretty sure you can never get more than 1 score point for a win but you can lose up to 3 score from a single loss. This might help you understand.
What I’m trying to say is that its LTIERALLY impossible for me to get top top 500 rankings atm because even if I played non stop I apparently cant gain rank points anymore.
Why do you think you deserve to be at top500? It doesn’t depend on how much you play, but mostly depends on winrate
WAT. That’s EXACTLY on what it depends, on how much you play, not some freaking winrate. Guess why people don’t bother, because the leaderboards are broken, it doesn’t reward skilled play but the AMOUNT of play.
So did some q’s today. Some were solo some were partial premade. All in all I probably won a little over half (or about half) of the games. Started the day with 58 points, finished with 56.
Honestly not sure what I’m suppose to do. Can I have a dev comment on this?
Pretty sure you can never get more than 1 score point for a win but you can lose up to 3 score from a single loss. This might help you understand.
What I’m trying to say is that its LTIERALLY impossible for me to get top top 500 rankings atm because even if I played non stop I apparently cant gain rank points anymore.
Why do you think you deserve to be at top500? It doesn’t depend on how much you play, but mostly depends on winrate
WAT. That’s EXACTLY on what it depends, on how much you play, not some freaking winrate. Guess why people don’t bother, because the leaderboards are broken, it doesn’t reward skilled play but the AMOUNT of play.
Devs change leaderboards formula from time to time, may be now it has other formula