Attachments:
Don’t call anyone out on their BS, that’s an infraction and a deleted post. —Anet.
2 duos 1 team vs 0 duos, do better anet.
why didn’t you include the score
Team Deathmatch for PvP – Raise the AoE cap for WvW – More unique events for PvE
This basically proofs nothing.
There is no score given which shows how “equal” the teams were in the end.
On a side note:
I encountered the same situation yesterday. 2 duos + 1 random in the enemy team, and i was with 4 other randoms in the same team, and yet we won the match. Playing against one or more duos does not automatically mean that they are better ot that the matchmaking was wrong.
I’m pretty sure when there are multiple duos in the team, their overall MMR is way lower. I never seem to lose against 2 duoq-s at the enemy team.
for example:
your team has an avg MMR of 1800 without any duoq
enemy team has an avg MMR of 1700 with 2 duoq
This is just a guess based on my experiences. And it looks totally fine like that
Heroes’ Ascent.. hero
Long White Hair – among others
Long White Hair – among others
(edited by Navajas.3147)
If ANet accepts that teams Vs solo pugs are unfair, then it has to accept that duo Vs solo pug is also unfair. This is logical. You can’t have one foot in and the other foot out. Eventually we will have team and solo only Qs again, because it makes the most sense. The mixing of teams and pugs was solely for the sake of ESports that the majority of players aren’t interested in.
If ANet accepts that teams Vs solo pugs are unfair, then it has to accept that duo Vs solo pug is also unfair. This is logical. You can’t have one foot in and the other foot out. Eventually we will have team and solo only Qs again, because it makes the most sense. The mixing of teams and pugs was solely for the sake of ESports that the majority of players aren’t interested in.
Who are you trying to convince with such a “great” argument.
Duos are not on the same level as a team of 5. With that said if arena net wants to include a team ONLY 5v5 they should. It would be nice for players like you to have an equally organized team to fight against so you can’t keep making excuses.
If ANet accepts that teams Vs solo pugs are unfair, then it has to accept that duo Vs solo pug is also unfair. This is logical. You can’t have one foot in and the other foot out. Eventually we will have team and solo only Qs again, because it makes the most sense. The mixing of teams and pugs was solely for the sake of ESports that the majority of players aren’t interested in.
Who are you trying to convince with such a “great” argument.
Duos are not on the same level as a team of 5. With that said if arena net wants to include a team ONLY 5v5 they should. It would be nice for players like you to have an equally organized team to fight against so you can’t keep making excuses.
Actually, it’s EXACTLY the same thing.
The pro duo argument here is that the 2 duo+1 were palced versus a team with players rated that much higher to offset the factor of having 2 premades on the team.
The same can be said of whole teams. It’s entirely feasible to have a team of much stronger players in order to offset the more organized team. I’ve lost games with a premade team on voice coms vs 100% random solos. My team simply had more inexperienced players than the other one (some were doing their first match on one of the last times i remember this happening) and the matchmaking offset the team factor.
The bigger problem with GW2 is that to do so it took like a 10 minute queue. Which isn’t really a good thing. Because GW2 isn’t really great at managing it’s PvP scene, so it’s not that populated.
It happens in most games, but in GW2 if the PvP forum is whiny enough they can turn a TEAM game into a solo game, and remove the most solo-friendly map from the rotation in the same breath.
If ANet accepts that teams Vs solo pugs are unfair, then it has to accept that duo Vs solo pug is also unfair. This is logical. You can’t have one foot in and the other foot out. Eventually we will have team and solo only Qs again, because it makes the most sense. The mixing of teams and pugs was solely for the sake of ESports that the majority of players aren’t interested in.
Who are you trying to convince with such a “great” argument.
Duos are not on the same level as a team of 5. With that said if arena net wants to include a team ONLY 5v5 they should. It would be nice for players like you to have an equally organized team to fight against so you can’t keep making excuses.
Actually, it’s EXACTLY the same thing.
The pro duo argument here is that the 2 duo+1 were palced versus a team with players rated that much higher to offset the factor of having 2 premades on the team.The same can be said of whole teams. It’s entirely feasible to have a team of much stronger players in order to offset the more organized team. I’ve lost games with a premade team on voice coms vs 100% random solos. My team simply had more inexperienced players than the other one (some were doing their first match on one of the last times i remember this happening) and the matchmaking offset the team factor.
The bigger problem with GW2 is that to do so it took like a 10 minute queue. Which isn’t really a good thing. Because GW2 isn’t really great at managing it’s PvP scene, so it’s not that populated.
It happens in most games, but in GW2 if the PvP forum is whiny enough they can turn a TEAM game into a solo game, and remove the most solo-friendly map from the rotation in the same breath.
It isn’t really close to the same thing. A team of 5 players will have a greater amount of synergy than 2 duos and a pug. A 5 man team can playoff their strengths and weaknesses, but more importantly a team of 5 players who know each other will practice together and have great control than randoms.
A team of 5 is more likely to have voice support than randoms who have 2 minutes to get to know each other.
So no. It is not the same.
If ANet accepts that teams Vs solo pugs are unfair, then it has to accept that duo Vs solo pug is also unfair. This is logical. You can’t have one foot in and the other foot out. Eventually we will have team and solo only Qs again, because it makes the most sense. The mixing of teams and pugs was solely for the sake of ESports that the majority of players aren’t interested in.
Who are you trying to convince with such a “great” argument.
Duos are not on the same level as a team of 5. With that said if arena net wants to include a team ONLY 5v5 they should. It would be nice for players like you to have an equally organized team to fight against so you can’t keep making excuses.
Actually, it’s EXACTLY the same thing.
The pro duo argument here is that the 2 duo+1 were palced versus a team with players rated that much higher to offset the factor of having 2 premades on the team.The same can be said of whole teams. It’s entirely feasible to have a team of much stronger players in order to offset the more organized team. I’ve lost games with a premade team on voice coms vs 100% random solos. My team simply had more inexperienced players than the other one (some were doing their first match on one of the last times i remember this happening) and the matchmaking offset the team factor.
The bigger problem with GW2 is that to do so it took like a 10 minute queue. Which isn’t really a good thing. Because GW2 isn’t really great at managing it’s PvP scene, so it’s not that populated.
It happens in most games, but in GW2 if the PvP forum is whiny enough they can turn a TEAM game into a solo game, and remove the most solo-friendly map from the rotation in the same breath.
that is the ideal scenario, if they can manage to separate q, the mm have to offsett the team factor putting them vs better individuals… as everithing has a dark side , and is not only the q times, that discourages the formation of new teams cuz new ones joining as a team will have harsh times until they get some team mechanics to offset the mmr diferences of individuals