Guild Wars 2

Does anyone know what the final amount of games needed to be on the leaderboard will be? 120 seems like a good guess but has the number ever been confirmed?

You know you can take how long the season lasts in weeks and multiply it by 10 right? There’s your answer.

BlaqueFyre.5678:

You know you can take how long the season lasts in weeks and multiply it by 10 right? There’s your answer.

March 7th to May 2nd is 8 weeks. 8*10=80. The current minimum games required is 105… Did you mean "multiply it by 15? That would be 120. I’m just asking if it has been confirmed that it will actually be 120.

Tapps.1479:

BlaqueFyre.5678:

You know you can take how long the season lasts in weeks and multiply it by 10 right? There’s your answer.

March 7th to May 2nd is 8 weeks. 8*10=80. The current minimum games required is 105… Did you mean "multiply it by 15? That would be 120. I’m just asking if it has been confirmed that it will actually be 120.

Ben Phongluangtham.1065:

OriOri.8724:

Evan Lesh.3295:

Spartacus.3192:

Evan Lesh.3295:

Spartacus.3192:

I really hope min games for next season will be at least 100 matches.

but thanks for doing this now.

We were thinking something like 10 per week, but it is configurable. We could to 1 a day, 20 per 2 weeks, etc.

The only problem with 10 per week is if people going on vacations for a week and failing the requirement,

So it could be every 2 weeks at least with a minimum total amount of at least 100 please.

The cutoff works just like dishonor in that if you come back and play those 10 games, you’ll go right back on the leaderboard. If you go on vacation a week before the season ends, well, then decay will remove you anyways.

So if I understand this correctly, someone could play just enough games to meet the minimum total requirement and place high on the leaderboards, AFK the entire rest of the season, then come back and play 10 more ranked games a day or two before the season ends and still keep their rank near the top? Or is this a 10 games per week thing where if they stop playing for say 7 weeks they have to play 70 games to get back on the leaderboard? Because I don’t think the prior is all that fair to the people who do play everyday and are risking their MMR every day.

The total is cumulative. If it’s 10 per week and an 8 week season, you need to have played 80 games by the end of the season.

So unless they changed it

I was pretty sure it has been 15 games per week from the start. The above quote sounded like he was just throwing out 10 as an example since it is easy to calculate and comprehend multiples of 10.

They may have changed it, but I haven’t seen any redpost saying as such.

BlaqueFyre.5678:

They may have changed it, but I haven’t seen any redpost saying as such.

It’s been +15 every week for the entire season. Like why do we need a redpost when basic observation gives us 100% accurate picture.

Crinn.7864:

BlaqueFyre.5678:

They may have changed it, but I haven’t seen any redpost saying as such.

It’s been +15 every week for the entire season. Like why do we need a redpost when basic observation gives us 100% accurate picture.

I have been gone the majority of this season and I haven’t paid attention to the games required since that’s no concern to me. Interesting hmm.

And normally when there are changes to a system like Leaderboards the Devs will say something through forum posts or patch notes which they didn’t in this case.

Crinn.7864:

BlaqueFyre.5678:

They may have changed it, but I haven’t seen any redpost saying as such.

It’s been +15 every week for the entire season. Like why do we need a redpost when basic observation gives us 100% accurate picture.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_burn_centers_in_the_United_States