(edited by Kitt.2567)
Kitt's Official Top 10 Solo Arena Gods NA
loooool
you’re delusional
loooool
you’re delusional
Right! lol Funny stuff!
This entire post gives credence to the current leaderboard system.
I hate to spill the beans on this but anyone who ever is or was a “god” doesn’t care about leaderboards because they know it’s a joke.
I’m not trying to rain on your parade, I’m just saying that your efforts aren’t exactly going to be well received by a community that had to deal with newer players who think leaderboards = skill
@$20 an hour! It’s worth it!
(edited by Ostricheggs.3742)
lololol aaron stongshot made a list LEGO BOYZ
The Absurd [RIP] ESL Go4 Weekly Winners
Outplayed By Children [GG] ToL 2 Winners
Yeah the leaderboards are pretty poopy. When the number one person hasn’t won a game since January 11, you know it’s a joke!
Heavens Rage
cmon same Top for EU mate!!
Well it’s not an awful idea. Pretty much trying to counteract what makes the leaderboards kittenty.
If you want people to take it seriously though, you should probably come up with a standard formula for ranking people, and post it. Right now, it looks like you just kind of did it however you felt like, and that doesn’t mean much.
Something like rating = exp(1-games/10)/(avg rank). Games would be games per month, with the exp term there to give it some diminishing returns.
Am I the only one confused as to why someone would make effort in making these lists?
Honest question really…
Lost? Confused? [TCS] – A guild for every state of body and mind
2nd that...
ele @ Gf Left Me Coz Of Ladderboard [vain] (EU) / Salty Strategy [PAIN]
To annoy elitists who don’t appear on the list?
Am I the only one confused as to why someone would make effort in making these lists?
Honest question really…
Cuz there isn’t anything else to do in-game.
The only exclusive skyhammer stream
“Gods” is a strong word. Maybe something more realistic like, “Good-At-a-Specific-Format-in-a-Specific-Genre-of-a-Dark-Corner-of-the-Competitive-Gaming-Sector”?
Well it’s not an awful idea. Pretty much trying to counteract what makes the leaderboards kittenty.
If you want people to take it seriously though, you should probably come up with a standard formula for ranking people, and post it. Right now, it looks like you just kind of did it however you felt like, and that doesn’t mean much.
Something like rating = exp(1-games/10)/(avg rank). Games would be games per month, with the exp term there to give it some diminishing returns.
I absolutely used formula to calculate them. it is not calculated from my feeling or personal assumption of each person’s skill, lol. I will release that formula later (well, just middle or high school math level calculation though) Player datas to put into my formula was collected from http://www.gw2score.com/.
(edited by Kitt.2567)
Oh my mistake, nice job then. Yeah, I would post the formula though, doesn’t need to be fancy, just so people know what you’re doing isn’t magic.