(edited by Hollywood Votary.8914)
More profession champ title tiers?
I want to see “Legendary ________” for wins while in the top ~500 or so of leaderboards, probably just team arena. Champ means nothing but that you have played a lot.
really bad engineer
I want to see “Legendary ________” for wins while in the top ~500 or so of leaderboards, probably just team arena. Champ means nothing but that you have played a lot.
I like that a lot ! I see so many high ranks / avengers, ransackers etc. that are still horribly bad… that kind of title would mean something without requiring to win season tournaments.
Thoth Divine – Power Necro
I Hope You Die – Burst Berserker
Seems pretty weird that you have to play over 20k tourneys to get to rank 80 but champion titles stop at 150. I’d like to be a Legendary Legionnaire, Paragon, Magus or Shadow :P
110k WvW kills | Champion Legionnaire, Paragon |
This would be really nice. A lot of people who main a class have WELL over 150 games won in queues.
I’d like to see a title:
Champion Troll
Win 100 tournament games as a Decap Engineer
[SALT]Natchniony – Necromancer, EU.
Streams: http://www.twitch.tv/rym144
Give titles for hard achievements, not just for playing hundreds or thousands of hours.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eE_msAKWdOs
I want to see “Legendary ________” for wins while in the top ~500 or so of leaderboards, probably just team arena. Champ means nothing but that you have played a lot.
I agree that a title track in the spirit of gw1 champ titles would be nice (i.e. create a rating prerequiste for a win-based title), but the leaderboard variance would have to be changed!
Now this I’d like to see.
I want to see “Legendary ________” for wins while in the top ~500 or so of leaderboards, probably just team arena. Champ means nothing but that you have played a lot.
Now on this topic I’d say it’s still just a wish. For a title based on high ranked games you need to actually have a decent and working rating system which GW2 lacks. I think it would be best if they first introduced a decent rating system with those leagues they talked about and THEN they should introduce titles based on it.