Guild Wars 2

I know its a test so, want to report this…
I know people can grind but there is something that need to be clearly adjusted, speak ing for the eu ladder , there is some one with 40% win ratino at the Second place….
Hope this season help you figureing ut out

Nope it will stay that way. Look at past seasons. Lexicity one of the worst rangers and with a 47% win ration was ranked 1.

The LB is based on total number of points you get. Which can be earned from losing as well as winning. Being rewarded 3 points for a loss because you scored 300 points when you were supposed to lose, seems legit for a LB application.

This game has become a complete utter joke.

I seems to remeber they have negative points for losing? Well if not this test should demonstrate that we need such things to happen

If you are supposed to win the match and you dont win, then yes you get negative points. If you aren’t supposed to win and you do, you gain points. And then the point values differ, per how badly you were beaten yadda yadda.

AndRec.3496:

I know its a test so, want to report this…
I know people can grind but there is something that need to be clearly adjusted, speak ing for the eu ladder , there is some one with 40% win ratino at the Second place….
Hope this season help you figureing ut out

I think by 2018 we could get a working leaderboard.

SYPHA.9283:

Being rewarded 3 points for a loss because you scored 300 points when you were supposed to lose, seems legit for a LB application.

While there are plenty of legitimate reasons to be disgruntled at the moment, let’s not pull things out of our orifices just to be dramatic.
https://www.guildwars2.com/en/news/finding-the-perfect-match/

Change the title. It’s mathematically impossible to have a negative ratio.

And yeah, the system is a bit better, but it’s still a grind.

Yeah you are right.. :P i mean more loss than win -.- math noob here