this rule about more points is common, nothing strange, nothing stupid as you stated.
but you seems to be so smart, why don’t you give us your suggestion?
First off points in gw2 work in a way that the better team can have less points and still dominate. For example, how many points do you earn for just defending a node compared to capping a node? Let’s say team 1 keeps recapping their close point over and over while the other team holds mid and close for the whole duration of the game. Team 1 gets more points for destroying a treb on Khylo that nobody gives a kitten about and gets a few kills offnode while controlling zero of them. It’s pretty mindblowing that some people think that the scoring system in GW2 means something after four years and probably judge by it. Embarassing tbh. Games/Sports that use this ruling have a scoring system directly related to the flow of the match. If such ruling cannot be deemed as fair you get sudden death or overtime like in football, basketball, tennis, NFL, volleyball, chess with a time limit and others.
I… just compared.. those numbers with a close game of mine… and I am speachless.
I guess I now understand why ppl call scrapper OP.
^ A pretty good example of a team that scores many kills but completely fails to control the map. Why should the red team be rewarded with a win if the said game hypothetically ended in a draw?
