(edited by Asura.6209)
No more "PVP", please rename "BVB"
I’m a dps and I really go easy in spvp.
Necromancer condi dps, but still a dps build, not a bunker or celebunker one.
And I see dragonhunters, mesmers and others that go in the match with dps builds and win.
I just destroyed a team with 2tempests and a druid. Really easy to kill if focus with dps.
so what are dragon hunter, viper revenant, power shiro, & marauders scrapper then?
currently a Boyfriend main :P
Waiting To ReRoll Mystic & Forget About Tyria
so what are dragon hunter, viper revenant, power shiro, & marauders scrapper then?
theyre already tanky cause of their skills alone.
Condi reaper is quite bunkerish in my honest opinion.
Marauder Scrapper can be called a bunker considering the Marauder amulet.
DH can block and invul for quite a while.
Not really familiar with Revenant. I never felt like playing a broken class.
Condi reaper is quite bunkerish in my honest opinion.
Marauder Scrapper can be called a bunker considering the Marauder amulet.
DH can block and invul for quite a while.
Not really familiar with Revenant. I never felt like playing a broken class.
Thieves have evades for days
Warriors have tons of HP and toughness with invulns.
See why this kind of logic is bad? What is defined as tanky is relative to the current meta. None of those specs you (or I) listed is “tanky” in the current meta.
YouTube
they are tanky.
what kind of meta are you playing?
Also, trying to take into a bunker discussion warrior and thief and compare em to revenant, guardian, necro, scrapper or elementalist… 2016 first troll.
or maybe you just didn’t see the great tournament where no1 couldnt kill anyone cause tanky + elementalist ( thanks anet. before we tought it was a crap spvp, but now we “really” miss the old meta ).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKBKak4gU0g
PvP is still PvP.
Passives vs Passives.
Svanir Appreciation Society [SAS]
PvP is still PvP.
Passives vs Passives.
-Total War: Warhammer
-Guild Wars 2