(edited by danizmax.4329)
Should low p. be disallowed from ...
I tried to google translate but still unable to understand what you mean.
Low p. = Small kitten?
I assume he meant to write low AP
Thief 80 | Elementalist 80 | Mesmer 80 | Necromancer 80 | Revenant TBA
Well if you must know, with that 45 character title limitation there was now way I could says what I wanted, I wanted to write “low ranked players” at the end I gave up and wrote “p.” lol xD
Well if you must know, with that 45 character title limitation there was now way I could says what I wanted, I wanted to write “low ranked players” at the end I gave up and wrote “p.” lol xD
Only one problem…Your title is not 45 characters even if you spelled out “low rank players”…
Just remove the “…” at the end and you’re good.
(edited by Kagamiku.9731)
How about not talking about the title, but the topic. sPvP has no limitations atm you see more rank 80 playing “Practice” than newbie, and I see alot newbie in ranked matches cuz there is no real guidance to them what to do.
Low p.=Low potatoes
lose a pip,win 2 pips,lose a pip,lose a pip…………..-
-Go go Espartz.-
You know the real problem behind pvp is that very few people actually play it right?.
1- Merging Solo and Premade queues was done for the same reason they implemented mega servers, to mask a dying population.
2- Same goes for matchmaking, it does not work not because it is technically difficult to implement, they would have fixed this ages ago if that were the case, but because not enough people play it for it to actually matter.
Vials Maize Balm Exploit(Halloween) 2014
Locked out of JP (Wintersday) 2015