The clown? Warrior Player =(

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Filhoduhomi.7496

Filhoduhomi.7496

Good evening,
I am very impressed with the lack of consideration of the Arena Net, with the Warrior Class, we became a joke for the other classes, In guild wars 2 class has been weakened with each Update, Decreased the stun of the Hammer, weakened the skills of explosion, weakened condition, the update for “Berserker” warrior is a disgrace, a trash, bureaucratic , predictable, tedious, compared the others got the game to three years and three years game with the main class … today I’m ashamed to mention in any that game with the class. There is on the part of the Arena Net any prediction review this lousy engineering management profession? Is a (successful) attempt on the part of the Arena Net to humiliate the class and to players who like the class and invest time and money in the same? If Yes, what is the purpose of this? I have sent email to arena net, requesting to review it, I wasn’t even responding …. Please I would like to be answered this time. respectfully. Sorry for my einglish.

(edited by Filhoduhomi.7496)

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Fluffball.8307

Fluffball.8307

You should play ranger.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Filhoduhomi.7496

Filhoduhomi.7496

Is an option, I have a including, sad to lose time and money commitment.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Fluffball.8307

Fluffball.8307

Is an option, I have a including, sad to lose time and money commitment.

I was joking, ranger has historically been ignored so badly by anet that their joke for the April Fool’s update was to not even list an update for it. Warrior has historically except for very early PvP mode been Anets golden child.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Filhoduhomi.7496

Filhoduhomi.7496

I get it, sorry about the insensitivity, but I’m really kittened off with what they did with the Warrior is unsustainable. If this is how you review the Ranger Also protest!!

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Zietlogik.6208

Zietlogik.6208

Warrior could use some help, but people think they are way way worse than they actually are. The main culprits are the overtuned classes running FotM (condi reaper, tempest, scrapper, etc.)

Look at the scrappers hammer skills for example, they added every possible role into a single weapon set and thought it would be balanced. Once the specs/classes come down a little, it will be fine.

Zietlogik [Warrior] Chronologix [Ranger] Ziet The Dreaded [Necromancer] Zietlogic [Revenant]

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: kdaddy.5431

kdaddy.5431

Is an option, I have a including, sad to lose time and money commitment.

I was joking, ranger has historically been ignored so badly by anet that their joke for the April Fool’s update was to not even list an update for it. Warrior has historically except for very early PvP mode been Anets golden child.

I would agree but Rangers were apart of the AG/ESL just not consistently like the warrior,ele,engy and thief.

The reason why rangers were not a solid class was because they lost too easily to thief and mesmers on off point battles. Typically rangers fought off point and even more so when the Longbow got upgraded.

The reason why i would disagree with you on this is because in the hands of the right players necros, rangers and mesmers could still excel and you saw all of them in the WTS 2.

ATM warriors can not beat any class in 1 vs 1 and team fights against equally skilled players/high level.

People are writing on the forums of being legendary warrior players but the build is easily countered and other players only need to fight you once and make a small change to the build when they see you.

This wasnt the case before, you had guys like hiro playing ranger and winning in the AG tournaments and competing in the ESL and of course nos on necro as well as a few others. Hiro was stalemating the old d/d eles and could win 1 vs 1 fights against certian thieves and mesmers. Was it a little under powered, yes but it was still viable.

You cant name a warrior build that is top 4 with in a team concept. Yes if you play a gun flame warrior you will hit someone for 10k occasional. If you play condi you can stack 12 bleed and 12 confusion with some burns against average players and beat them. Once you start playing AG/ESL level players these players wont get hit with the big burst hits in 1 vs 1 and they already have a planned counter.

I have to say that thief is not in a great spot either but that is for another thread.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Filhoduhomi.7496

Filhoduhomi.7496

Yes man, I understand, but that’s the big question, performed many Corrective adjustments to desconfiguraram the Warrior class, the other (condi reaper, tempest, scrapper) could stay strong as long as the class warrior follows the evolution and that has not happened and with the reductions that had already been carried out, we have no possibility of Defense, actually the last reasonable thing was an increase in Regen , who served us to observe unable and for more time, while we are punished by other classes ….

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: FrownyClown.8402

FrownyClown.8402

Every time I get a warrior on my team I lose. It would be great to see a revival of hambow. The biggest limiting factor for warriors I think is their lack of contribution to a fight.


Bad Elementalist

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Forestgreen.7981

Forestgreen.7981

I won 90% of my games trolling on warrior Diamond Tier1 3/4 to legendary, then again from legendary to halfway to Prestige 2. Warrior isn’t 100% rubbish but yes they could use a few buffs.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Silverthorn.8576

Silverthorn.8576

Warrior need buff in term of sustain then he will join the power creep club.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Ravenmoon.5318

Ravenmoon.5318

They have balance team that does balance.

If it was up to me they’d get no salaries for the past few months by now. Because I simply don’t see their work, whatsoever.

I’d pay them once every 6 or so months.

Better yet, i’d fire them all lazy balance team and hire freelancers. Anyone else would do better.

inb4 people saying “do you think its easy to balance a game with hundreds of traits and skills” … yes it kittening is. Weekly updates and consumer feedback. Weekly updates and consumer feedback. Repeat ad infinitum. With such a release cycle the game will esport ready within 6-8 months.

(edited by Ravenmoon.5318)

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: shagwell.1349

shagwell.1349

I won 90% of my games trolling on warrior Diamond Tier1 3/4 to legendary, then again from legendary to halfway to Prestige 2. Warrior isn’t 100% rubbish but yes they could use a few buffs.

With what build? Condi. Thats not playing warrior.

[orz] below mediocre – we sponsor Arenanet
Piken Square EU, maybe soon on your server.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Crimson Shi.5047

Crimson Shi.5047

Warrior need buff in term of sustain then he will join the power creep club.

Pretty much this, a warrior CAN kill you but they tend to get out sustained especially in big fights, and an support specced class ele/druid can only do so much. Going by the times i went unranked (I was practicing there rather then ranked) I was able to dismantle most anyone 1 on 1 but during fights like 3 or more I would get focused, and killed after my stances ran out.

The clown? Warrior Player =(

in PvP

Posted by: Filhoduhomi.7496

Filhoduhomi.7496

Forestgreen.7981:
I ganhou 90% dos meus jogos corrico na guerreiro Diamante Tier1 3/4 a lendária, em seguida, novamente a partir do lendário a meio caminho para Prestige 2. Guerreiro não é 100% lixo, mas sim, eles poderiam usar alguns buffs.

Build? I also chose to play with the class, despite the revolt …