Be careful what you wish for, Anet might just give it to you “HoT”
“…let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die;.”
“…let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die;.”
To all you Rangers
Pewpew-Rangers should be paired with some kind of bunker or something. If you’re a bunker, you should stay on point when you can, though a LB-Ranger can’t be expected to be trying to fight on points because that will ultimately fail. Their whole purpose is different. Bunkers job to bunk, Ranger’s job to range, y’know?
Pewpew-Rangers should be paired with some kind of bunker or something. If you’re a bunker, you should stay on point when you can, though a LB-Ranger can’t be expected to be trying to fight on points because that will ultimately fail. Their whole purpose is different. Bunkers job to bunk, Ranger’s job to range, y’know?
Then they are useless. Even bunkers can’t hold long when being focused by 3 people.
Be careful what you wish for, Anet might just give it to you “HoT”
“…let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die;.”
“…let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we shall die;.”
So you have 1v3 at the point+1 ranger. It is a 2v3. The team with 3 should win considering all 5 players have the same skill lvl.
Ouroboro Knight’s [OK]
If the ranger is smart and the bunker is bunking, the ranger should be killing the other 3 from 1500 range, since their whole thing is doing high-burst from afar. If he’s not… well, then that’s just the player not doing a good job.
Also, Dudis, you cannot assume the same skill level makes a fight equal. Skill is only half the battle, the other half being build. If one’s build is better than the others, it will raise the “battle level” of the better build beyond his skill level alone.
If the ranger is smart and the bunker is bunking, the ranger should be killing the other 3 from 1500 range, since their whole thing is doing high-burst from afar. If he’s not… well, then that’s just the player not doing a good job.
Also, Dudis, you cannot assume the same skill level makes a fight equal. Skill is only half the battle, the other half being build. If one’s build is better than the others, it will raise the “battle level” of the better build beyond his skill level alone.
Considering one is running a zerker bow ranger the team with 2 already has 50% of it not running a meta build. No a ranger wont be able to kill 3 players from range. Maybe 1 , but not 3. They can reflect, send 1 player to kill the ranger, use line of sight to avoid it, etc… Even if it down 1 the other 2 can ress it. What do you think it’s easier: 1 ranger kill 3 or 3 kill 1 guy sitting in the point?
Ouroboro Knight’s [OK]
Well clearly they need to buff Rangers further.
If the ranger is smart and the bunker is bunking, the ranger should be killing the other 3 from 1500 range, since their whole thing is doing high-burst from afar. If he’s not… well, then that’s just the player not doing a good job.
Also, Dudis, you cannot assume the same skill level makes a fight equal. Skill is only half the battle, the other half being build. If one’s build is better than the others, it will raise the “battle level” of the better build beyond his skill level alone.
Considering one is running a zerker bow ranger the team with 2 already has 50% of it not running a meta build. No a ranger wont be able to kill 3 players from range. Maybe 1 , but not 3. They can reflect, send 1 player to kill the ranger, use line of sight to avoid it, etc… Even if it down 1 the other 2 can ress it. What do you think it’s easier: 1 ranger kill 3 or 3 kill 1 guy sitting in the point?
If you’re facing a pickup with multiple longbow rangers and you’re running coordinated, you’d better be winning 3-2’s.
A ranger coming in slightly late on people trying to 2-1 a bunker is bad news for the 2 though, the tactic totally works.